Moorland v. Martinez
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
vs.
OFFICER E. MARTINEZ,
Defendant.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
8
10
No. C 12-05892 YGR (PR)
GREGORY L. MOURLAND, JR.,
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also seeks
11
leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not exhausted California's
12
prison administrative process, however.
13
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to provide
14
that "[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any
15
other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such
16
administrative remedies as are available are exhausted." 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Although once
17
within the discretion of the district court, exhaustion in prisoner cases covered by § 1997e(a) is now
18
mandatory. Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002). All available remedies must now be
19
exhausted; those remedies "need not meet federal standards, nor must they be 'plain, speedy, and
20
effective.'" Id. (citation omitted). Even when the prisoner seeks relief not available in grievance
21
proceedings, notably money damages, exhaustion is a prerequisite to suit. Id.; Booth v. Churner,
22
532 U.S. 731, 741 (2001). Similarly, exhaustion is a prerequisite to all prisoner suits about prison
23
life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege
24
excessive force or some other wrong. Porter, 534 U.S. at 532. PLRA's exhaustion requirement
25
requires "proper exhaustion" of available administrative remedies. Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81,
26
94 (2006).
27
The State of California provides its prisoners the right to appeal administratively "any
28
departmental decision, action, condition or policy perceived by those individuals as adversely
1
affecting their welfare." Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.1(a). It also provides them the right to file
2
appeals alleging misconduct by correctional officers/officials. Id. § 3084.1(e). In order to exhaust
3
available administrative remedies within this system, a prisoner must proceed through several levels
4
of appeal: (1) informal resolution; (2) formal written appeal on a CDC 602 inmate appeal form;
5
(3) second level appeal to the institution head or designee; and (4) third level appeal to the Director
6
of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Barry v. Ratelle, 985 F. Supp. 1235,
7
1237 (S.D. Cal. 1997) (citing Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.5). A final decision from the Director's
8
level of review satisfies the exhaustion requirement under § 1997e(a). Id. at 1237-38.
Non-exhaustion under § 1997e(a) is an affirmative defense which should be brought by
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
defendants in an unenumerated motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b).
11
Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003). However, a complaint may be dismissed by
12
the court for failure to exhaust if a prisoner "conce[des] to nonexhaustion" and "no exception to
13
exhaustion applies." Id. at 1120. Here, Plaintiff concedes he has not exhausted his administrative
14
remedies. Plaintiff has not presented any extraordinary circumstances which might compel that he
15
be excused from complying with PLRA's exhaustion requirement. Cf. Booth, 532 U.S. at 741 n.6
16
(courts should not read "futility or other exceptions" into § 1997e(a)).
17
Accordingly, Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the complaint
18
is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after exhausting California's prison administrative
19
process. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1201 (9th Cir. 2002) (action must be
20
dismissed without prejudice unless prisoner exhausted available administrative remedies before he
21
filed suit, even if prisoner fully exhausts while the suit is pending).
22
23
24
25
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, terminate any pending motions, and close the
file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 8, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\YGR\CR.12\Moorland5892.dism(unexh).wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?