Bravo v. Cates

Filing 6

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 VICTOR J BRAVO, 12 13 Plaintiff(s), No. C 12-06459 (DMR) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. 14 THE CDCR, 15 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to serve Defendants with the summons and 18 complaint. [Docket No. 5.] Plaintiff filed this case on December 20, 2012. [See Docket No. 1.] 19 Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, he has until April 19, 2013 to 20 complete service of the summons and complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Because Plaintiff still 21 has ample time to serve Defendants, the court denies his motion without prejudice. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: February 8, 2013 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?