King v. Hensley et al
Filing
35
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/17/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN LABRUCE KING,
Case No.: 13-CV-051 YGR
8
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
vs.
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
HUCK HENSLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
On March 22, 2013, this Court issued its Order Continuing Hearing On Motions To Dismiss
14
and Motion to Strike, motions as to which Plaintiff John LaBruce King (“Plaintiff”) had filed no
15
opposition. (Dkt. No. 32.) The Court continued the pending hearings and ordered that Plaintiff file
16
an opposition no later than April 9, 2013. As the Court stated therein, “[f]ailure to file an opposition
17
by that date will result in dismissal of the action against these Defendants] for failure to prosecute.”
18
(Id. at 1:27-28.)
19
As of this date, no opposition or other response has been filed by Plaintiff. Accordingly,
20
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
21
failure to prosecute.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:April 17, 2013
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?