King v. Hensley et al

Filing 35

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/17/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JOHN LABRUCE KING,

Case No.: 13-CV-051 YGR

8

Plaintiff,
9

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE

vs.
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13

HUCK HENSLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
On March 22, 2013, this Court issued its Order Continuing Hearing On Motions To Dismiss

14

and Motion to Strike, motions as to which Plaintiff John LaBruce King (“Plaintiff”) had filed no

15

opposition. (Dkt. No. 32.) The Court continued the pending hearings and ordered that Plaintiff file

16

an opposition no later than April 9, 2013. As the Court stated therein, “[f]ailure to file an opposition

17

by that date will result in dismissal of the action against these Defendants] for failure to prosecute.”

18

(Id. at 1:27-28.)

19

As of this date, no opposition or other response has been filed by Plaintiff. Accordingly,

20

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

21

failure to prosecute.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:April 17, 2013

____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE