Christian v. Homeward Residential, Inc.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 14 Renotice of Motion re 14 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Def inite Statement and Notice of Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint, 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement; MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Compl aint. Responses due by 4/26/2013. Replies due by 5/3/2013. Motion Hearing set for 5/14/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/4/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TYRONE M. CHRISTIAN,
Case No.: 13-CV-00065 YGR
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC.,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
On January 14, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 7). The hearing on the
motion is set for April 9, 2013. Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or about January 31, 2013. Civ.
L.R. 7-3(a); see also, Dkt. No. 13 (Notice of Non-Opposition).
To date, Plaintiff has failed to oppose the Motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the
Motion to Dismiss no later than April 26, 2013. Failure to file an opposition by that date will result
in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute. Any reply to an opposition must be served and filed
not more than 7 days after the opposition is filed. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c).
The hearing date of April 9, 2013 is hereby CONTINUED to May 14, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.
The Motion to Appear by Telephone at the April 9, 2013 (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?