Hayes et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 Amended MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 4/23/2013. Replies due by 4/30/2013 . Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2013 is CONTINUED to 5/14/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/9/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RALPH HAYES, KENNETH HAYES, AND RUTH
Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No.: 13-CV-420 YGR
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. A//K/A WELLS
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, F/K/A WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB, F/K/A/ WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB, AND DOES 1-10,
On February 3, 2013, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) filed a Motion to
Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 5.) Thereafter this action was reassigned to the undersigned and, on March 15,
2013, Wells Fargo filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss for hearing on April 30, 2013. Plaintiff’s
opposition was due on March 29, 2013. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a).
To date, Plaintiffs have failed to oppose the Motion. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to the
Motion to Dismiss no later than April 23, 2013. Failure to file an opposition by that date will result
in dismissal of the action against Wells Fargo for failure to prosecute. Any reply to an opposition
must be served and filed not more than 7 days after the opposition is served and filed. Civ. L.R. 722
The hearing date of April 30, 2013, is hereby CONTINUED to May 14, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 9, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?