Roberson v. CHP Chief et al
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/30/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
ANTONIO ROBERSON,
5
6
7
8
No. C 13-02962 YGR (PR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
vs.
KYLE KEPLER, et al.,
Defendants.
/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiff filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On August 8,
11
2013, mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was returned as undeliverable to the Clerk of the Court
12
with the notation "RETURN TO SENDER. NOT IN CUSTODY." To date, Plaintiff has not updated
13
his address with the Court or submitted any further pleadings in this case.
14
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address
15
changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the
16
new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint when:
17
(1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable,
18
and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the
19
pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b).
20
More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was
21
returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address.
22
Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern
23
District Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions,
24
and close the file.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 30, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\YGR\CR.13\Roberson.2962.DISM.311.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?