Burns v. Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 1/27/2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/26/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. C 13-04122 YGR (PR)

JEROME BURNS, SR.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner,
vs.
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden,

12

Respondent.

/

13
14

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

15

U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the $5.00 filing fee. It does not appear from the face of the petition that

16

it is without merit. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders:

17

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the petition and all

18

attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State

19

of California. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at his current address.

20

2.

Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60)

21

days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules

22

Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued.

23

Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records that have

24

been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the

25

petition.

26

3.

If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse with

27

the Court and serving it on Respondent within sixty (60) days of his receipt of the Answer. Should

28

Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for decision sixty (60) days
after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's Answer.

1

4.

Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days

2

of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an Answer, as set

3

forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If

4

Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an

5

opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within sixty (60) days of receipt of the

6

motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fourteen

7

(14) days of receipt of any opposition.

8

5.

It is Petitioner's responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the Court

and Respondent informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court's orders in a

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

9

timely fashion. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose

11

address changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address

12

specifying the new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint

13

when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not

14

deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written

15

communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b); see also

16

Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases).

17
18
19

Petitioner must also serve on Respondent's counsel all communications with the Court by
mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent's counsel.
6.

Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted.

20

Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the

21

deadline sought to be extended.

22
23
24
25

7.

Randy Grounds, the current warden of the prison where Petitioner is incarcerated, has

been substituted as Respondent pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:

November 26, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28

G:\PRO-SE\YGR\HC.13\Burns4122.OSC.frm

2