Hutchison v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
***DISREGARD, INCORRECT PROOF OF SERVICE ATTACHED.*** ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/3/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016) Modified on 5/3/2016 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWIN JAY HUTCHINSON,
TO THE MOTIONS FOR
CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY
AUTHORITY, et al.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
C 13-04635 CW
On September 25, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion
under Rule 56(d) and ordered that all discovery disputes and
issues be presented to Magistrate Judge Beeler.
The Court further ordered that Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’
motions for summary judgment would be due twenty-eight days after
the discovery disputes were resolved.
Magistrate Judge Beeler entered an order requiring Defendant A.
Deems to produce certain photographs and stating, “Discovery is
Docket No. 113.
On April 29, 2016,
Docket No. 181.
Defendant Deems shall file a notice when he produces the
summary judgment is within twenty-eight days thereafter.
Defendants’ replies are due fourteen days after service of
Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motions for
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 3, 2016
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?