Hutchison v. California Prison Industry Authority et al

Filing 182

***DISREGARD, INCORRECT PROOF OF SERVICE ATTACHED.*** ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/3/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016) Modified on 5/3/2016 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

EDWIN JAY HUTCHINSON,

5
6

No.

Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
TO THE MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

7
8

CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY
AUTHORITY, et al.,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

C 13-04635 CW

Defendants.
________________________________/
On September 25, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion

12

under Rule 56(d) and ordered that all discovery disputes and

13

issues be presented to Magistrate Judge Beeler.

14

The Court further ordered that Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’

15

motions for summary judgment would be due twenty-eight days after

16

the discovery disputes were resolved.

17

Magistrate Judge Beeler entered an order requiring Defendant A.

18

Deems to produce certain photographs and stating, “Discovery is

19

now closed.”

20

Docket No. 113.

On April 29, 2016,

Docket No. 181.

Defendant Deems shall file a notice when he produces the

21

photographs.

22

summary judgment is within twenty-eight days thereafter.

23

Defendants’ replies are due fourteen days after service of

24

Plaintiff’s response

25

Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motions for

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:

May 3, 2016
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge