Dawson
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/3/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
v.
DAVID MEDINA, et al.,
Defendants.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
8
10
No. C 13-04646 YGR (PR)
CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON,
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also seeks
11
leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not exhausted California's
12
prison administrative process, however.
13
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PLRA") amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to provide
14
that "[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any
15
other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such
16
administrative remedies as are available are exhausted." 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Although once
17
within the discretion of the district court, exhaustion in prisoner cases covered by § 1997e(a) is now
18
mandatory. Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002). All available remedies must now be
19
exhausted; those remedies "need not meet federal standards, nor must they be 'plain, speedy, and
20
effective.'" Id. (citation omitted). Even when the prisoner seeks relief not available in grievance
21
proceedings, notably money damages, exhaustion is a prerequisite to suit. Id.; Booth v. Churner,
22
532 U.S. 731, 741 (2001). Similarly, exhaustion is a prerequisite to all prisoner suits about prison
23
life, whether they involve general circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege
24
excessive force or some other wrong. Porter, 534 U.S. at 532. PLRA's exhaustion requirement
25
requires "proper exhaustion" of available administrative remedies. Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81,
26
94 (2006).
27
departmental decision, action, condition or policy perceived by those individuals as adversely
28
affecting their welfare." Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.1(a). It also provides them the right to file
The State of California provides its prisoners the right to appeal administratively "any
1
appeals alleging misconduct by correctional officers/officials. Id. § 3084.1(e). In order to exhaust
2
available administrative remedies within this system, a prisoner must proceed through several levels
3
of appeal: (1) informal resolution; (2) formal written appeal on a CDC 602 inmate appeal form;
4
(3) second level appeal to the institution head or designee; and (4) third level appeal to the Director
5
of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Barry v. Ratelle, 985 F. Supp. 1235,
6
1237 (S.D. Cal. 1997) (citing Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.5). A final decision from the Director's
7
level of review satisfies the exhaustion requirement under § 1997e(a). Id. at 1237-38.
8
Non-exhaustion under § 1997e(a) is an affirmative defense which should be brought by
9
defendants in an unenumerated motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b).
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003). However, a complaint may be dismissed by
11
the court for failure to exhaust if a prisoner "conce[des] to nonexhaustion" and "no exception to
12
exhaustion applies." Id. at 1120. Here, Plaintiff concedes he has not exhausted his administrative
13
remedies. Plaintiff has not presented any extraordinary circumstances which might compel that he
14
be excused from complying with PLRA's exhaustion requirement. Cf. Booth, 532 U.S. at 741 n.6
15
(courts should not read "futility or other exceptions" into § 1997e(a)).
16
Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after exhausting
17
California's prison administrative process. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1201 (9th
18
Cir. 2002) (action must be dismissed without prejudice unless prisoner exhausted available
19
administrative remedies before he filed suit, even if prisoner fully exhausts while the suit is
20
pending).
21
22
23
24
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, close the file and terminate any pending
motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
January 3, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\YGR\CR.13\Dawson4646.DISM(unexh).wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?