Butler v. Fonseca et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING. Show Cause Response by Plaintiff is due by 12/11/2013. The Court VACATES the January 14, 2014 hearing date. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/4/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service, # 3 Certificate/Proof of Service, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 SHAVON BUTLER aka Suki Lee, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-CV-4977 YGR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING v. HASLEY FONSECA, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 This Order Also Relates to: Case No. 13-cv-4978 Case No. 13-cv-5165 Case No. 13-cv-5166 18 In a five-week period spanning from September 26 to November 1, 2013, pro se Plaintiff 19 Shavon Butler, aka Suki Lee, filed at least four separate civil lawsuits in the California Superior 20 Court for Santa Clara County, seeking a total of over $800 billion in damages. In her four 21 complaints, Plaintiff alleges a plot to injure her which implicates famous entertainers, household- 22 name corporations, several television networks, the Mafia, and the President of the United States. 23 Among the named defendants are Social Security workers who, it is alleged, aided in the plot by 24 delaying Plaintiff's benefits determination and thereby causing her to be unable to move out of her 25 apartment. Plaintiff also named a United States Post Office as a defendant, for allegedly allowing 26 certain entertainers to work at the post office under false identities and steal Plaintiff's mail. These 27 defendants being federal officers sued under state law for acts taken under color of office, the 28 United States Attorney appeared on their behalf and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442, removed the 1 four cases in which they were named to this Court. The undersigned judge related all four cases on 2 November 25, 2013. (Case No. 13-cv-4977, Dkt. No. 13 ("November 25 Order").) 3 Between November 1 and November 12, 2013—that is, after removal to federal court but 4 before the cases were related—at least one defendant in each case filed a motion to dismiss. The 5 Court's November 25 Order required the moving defendants to renotice their motions to dismiss for 6 hearing before the undersigned on January 14, 2014. By November 27, 2013, at least one of the 7 moving defendants in each case had complied. 8 The Court's November 25 Order changed the motions' hearing date but expressly left undisturbed all other briefing deadlines. The last deadline for Plaintiff to oppose any of the 10 pending motions to dismiss was November 29, 2013. That date has passed without Plaintiff 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 opposing any of the motions or otherwise entering an appearance before this Court. 12 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why her four lawsuits should 13 not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff must file a written response to this Order no later 14 than Wednesday, December 11, 2013. Failure to do so will result in the immediate dismissal of 15 her lawsuits. 16 17 18 The Court hereby VACATES the January 14, 2014 hearing date. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the motions will be determined, if necessary, without oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 Date: December 4, 2013 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?