Cherwink v. Colvin

Filing 5

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/13/2013. (Attachments: # 1 consent/declination form)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2013)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

ROBERT EUGENE CHERWINK,

6
7
8

No. C 13-05147 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING
PARTIES TO INFORM
COURT WHETHER THEY
CONSENT TO A
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR
ALL PURPOSES

v.
CAROLYN W COLVIN,

9

Defendant.
/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the

12

parties may consent at any time to reassignment of the case to a

13

magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

14

judgment.

15

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).

Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the

16

Court, no later than November 27, 2013, as to whether they consent

17

to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the

18

instant action.1 For the parties' convenience, a consent form is

19

attached hereto; forms are also available at

20

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the "Forms" section.

21

are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a

22

specific magistrate judge.

23
24

The parties

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 13, 2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

25
26
27
1

28

Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the
Court in their Joint Case Management Statement filed in connection
with a case management conference.
Because the instant action
involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case
management conference has not been scheduled.