Adams et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
44
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Attorney Aaron P. Silberman,Lauren Beth Kramer for Curtis W Adams,Aaron P. Silberman,Lauren Beth Kramer for Frances R. Adams added. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014) Modified on 7/11/2014 (fs, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Curtis & Frances Adams
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Wells Fargo, et al.,
Defendant(s).
)
)
) Case Number: 13-cv-5164 -YGR
)
) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
Because the Plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him/her in this matter
and a volunteer attorney is willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request of
the Federal Pro Bono Project, Aaron P. Silberman and Lauren Kramer of Rogers Joseph O’Donnell
are hereby appointed as counsel for Plaintiffs in this matter.
The scope of this referral shall be for:
all purposes for the duration of the case
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
mediation
early neutral evaluation
settlement conference
briefing
and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for
summary judgment or motion to dismiss):
__________________________________________________________
discovery as follows:
__________________________________________________________
other:
______ADR________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this
order. Counsel shall be familiar with General Order No. 25 and the Federal Pro Bono Project
Guidelines posted on the Court’s website.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 11, 2014
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT D TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT GUIDELINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?