Jackson v. Foulk
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 19 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Motion to Dismiss Petition for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies. Responses due by 10/23/2014. Replies due by 11/6/2014. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 09/25/14 (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2014) Modified on 9/26/2014 (jlmS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
CLIFFORD L. JACKSO
C
ON,
Case No. 13-cv-0540
07-SBA (PR
R)
Petitioner,
,
8
ORDER G
GRANTIN REQUE FOR
NG
EST
SECOND EXTENSION OF T
D
TIME
FOR PET
TITIONER TO FILE
R
E
OPPOSIT
TION TO M
MOTION T
TO
DISMISS
S
v.
9
10
F. FOULK, Warden,
W
nt.
Responden
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
(Dkt. 19)
12
13
14
Petition has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to fil his
ner
d
f
d
n
le
15
opp
position to Respondent Motion to Dismiss. Having rea and cons
R
t's
o
ad
sidered Peti
itioner's
16
requ
uest, and go cause appearing,
ood
a
17
IT IS HEREBY OR
H
RDERED that Petition
t
ner's reques for a seco extensio of time
st
ond
on
18
is GRANTED. The time in which Petitioner ma file his o
G
.
ay
opposition t Respondent's
to
19
Motion to Dism will be extended up to and in
miss
e
u
ncluding tw
wenty-eight (28) days from the
t
20
date of this Ord
e
der.
21
22
Respondent shall file a reply brief no late than four
f
b
er
rteen (14) d
days after t date
the
Peti
itioner's opp
position is filed.
f
23
This Or
rder termina Docket No. 19.
ates
t
24
IT IS SO ORDERE
O
ED.
25
ted: Septem
mber 25, 2014
Dat
26
27
28
P:\PR
RO-SE\SBA\HC.13
3\Jackson5407.gra
ant2ndEOT.MTD.d
docx
_____
_________
__________
__________
________
SAUN
NDRA BR
ROWN ARM
MSTRONG
G
UNIT
TED STAT DISTR
TES
RICT JUDG
GE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?