Jackson v. Foulk

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 19 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Motion to Dismiss Petition for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies. Responses due by 10/23/2014. Replies due by 11/6/2014. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 09/25/14 (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2014) Modified on 9/26/2014 (jlmS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 CLIFFORD L. JACKSO C ON, Case No. 13-cv-0540 07-SBA (PR R) Petitioner, , 8 ORDER G GRANTIN REQUE FOR NG EST SECOND EXTENSION OF T D TIME FOR PET TITIONER TO FILE R E OPPOSIT TION TO M MOTION T TO DISMISS S v. 9 10 F. FOULK, Warden, W nt. Responden United States District Court Northern District of California 11 (Dkt. 19) 12 13 14 Petition has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to fil his ner d f d n le 15 opp position to Respondent Motion to Dismiss. Having rea and cons R t's o ad sidered Peti itioner's 16 requ uest, and go cause appearing, ood a 17 IT IS HEREBY OR H RDERED that Petition t ner's reques for a seco extensio of time st ond on 18 is GRANTED. The time in which Petitioner ma file his o G . ay opposition t Respondent's to 19 Motion to Dism will be extended up to and in miss e u ncluding tw wenty-eight (28) days from the t 20 date of this Ord e der. 21 22 Respondent shall file a reply brief no late than four f b er rteen (14) d days after t date the Peti itioner's opp position is filed. f 23 This Or rder termina Docket No. 19. ates t 24 IT IS SO ORDERE O ED. 25 ted: Septem mber 25, 2014 Dat 26 27 28 P:\PR RO-SE\SBA\HC.13 3\Jackson5407.gra ant2ndEOT.MTD.d docx _____ _________ __________ __________ ________ SAUN NDRA BR ROWN ARM MSTRONG G UNIT TED STAT DISTR TES RICT JUDG GE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?