Haden v. Chapelle
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/15/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. C 13-5512 KAW (PR)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
KEVIN CHAPELL, et al.,
Plaintiff Steven Haden, a state prisoner incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has filed
United States District Court
Northern District of California
a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the violation of his constitutional
rights by the warden and medical staff at SQSP. On March 19, 2014, the Court dismissed the
complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days in which to file an
amended complaint. Plaintiff filed several motions for an extension of time in which to file his
amended complaint. On June 27 and August 11, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff's motions for
extensions of time. See Doc. nos. 20 and 23. In its August 11, 2014 Order, the Court granted
Plaintiff twenty-one days from the date of the Order to file his amended complaint. The Court
stated, "this will be the last motion for an extension of time that the Court is inclined to consider.
If the amended complaint is not filed within twenty-one days, the case shall be dismissed without
More than twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions
and close the file
IT IS SO ORDERED.
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?