Haden v. Chapelle

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/15/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

STEVEN HADEN,

Case No. C 13-5512 KAW (PR)

Plaintiff,
5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

v.

6

KEVIN CHAPELL, et al.,

7

Defendants.

8
9
10

Plaintiff Steven Haden, a state prisoner incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has filed

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the violation of his constitutional

12

rights by the warden and medical staff at SQSP. On March 19, 2014, the Court dismissed the

13

complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days in which to file an

14

amended complaint. Plaintiff filed several motions for an extension of time in which to file his

15

amended complaint. On June 27 and August 11, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff's motions for

16

extensions of time. See Doc. nos. 20 and 23. In its August 11, 2014 Order, the Court granted

17

Plaintiff twenty-one days from the date of the Order to file his amended complaint. The Court

18

stated, "this will be the last motion for an extension of time that the Court is inclined to consider.

19

If the amended complaint is not filed within twenty-one days, the case shall be dismissed without

20

prejudice."

21

More than twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

22

Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions

23

and close the file

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: 9/15/14

_________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE