Compton v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 15

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/12/2014 is CONTINUED to Monday, 6/2/2014 02:00 PM before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Updated Case Management Conference Statement filed by 7/28/2014. Plaintiff to advise Court no later than 5/23/2014 regarding whether he would consent to a magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/8/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 BRIAN COMPTON, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No.: 14-CV-490 YGR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 The Court has reviewed the case management statements of the parties. (Dkt. Nos. 10, 13.) In 14 light of the information provided therein, the case management conference currently set for May 12, 15 2014, is CONTINUED to June 2, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. 16 Plaintiff Brian Compton is DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than May 23, 2014, 17 whether he would consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant 18 action, including trial. Defendants have already indicated that they would consent to the jurisdiction 19 of a magistrate judge. For the parties’ convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also 20 available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised 21 that they may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 8, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?