Flowers v. Foulk
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DENYING 28 MOTION TO SEAL. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 10/21/2014. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/22/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
JOSEPH FLOWERS,
5
6
7
Petitioner,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
v.
Doc. No. 28
F. FOULK, Warden,
8
9
No. C 14-0589 CW (PR)
Respondent.
________________________________/
10
INTRODUCTION
United States District Court
11
On February 7, 2014, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding
12
pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant
13
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a conviction and sentence from
14
Marin County Superior Court and raising claims of ineffective
15
assistance of trial and appellate counsel, insufficient evidence,
16
inadmissible evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, actual innocence
17
and cumulative prejudice.
On March 18, 2014, the Court granted
18
Petitioner’s motion to stay his petition while he exhausted state
19
court remedies.
On the same date, the case was administratively
20
closed.
On June 3, 2014, the Court granted Petitioner's motion to
21
reopen his case and lift the stay, denied his motions to seal and
22
dismissed his amended petition with leave to amend.
On June 23,
23
2014, Petitioner filed an amended petition, Doc. no. 25, and, on
24
June 27, 2014, he filed another amended petition, Doc. no. 27, and
25
a motion to "have exhibits retracked and filed under seal," Doc.
26
no. 28, which the Court construes to be a motion to seal.
27
28
On July
1
16, 2014, Petitioner filed a request for the Court to send him two
2
copies of his two amended petitions, Doc. no. 30.
3
4
5
DISCUSSION
I. Motion to Seal
In his motion to seal, Petitioner seeks to seal Exhibits G,
Q, P and Z(7) because they are based on a conversation he had with
7
his attorney in the Marin County Jail that was overheard by an
8
informant.
9
the government's informees [sic] learn of the appellant's defense
10
they'll be of in [sic] position of formulating answers to offset
11
United States District Court
6
the defense, upon 'if' [sic] any hearing of evidentiary values is
12
heard."
13
His reason for sealing these documents is that, "if
In its previous Order, the Court granted Petitioner leave to
14
re-file a motion to seal, but instructed him to follow Civil Local
15
Rule 79-5, which he has failed to do.
16
documents he wishes to seal with his motion in redacted form for
17
the public docket and non-redacted form for sealing, Petitioner
18
has attached just two of the documents, P and Z(7), in non-
19
redacted form, to his amended petition.
20
have already been filed by the Clerk of the Court on the public
21
docket.
22
Petitioner's original petition.
23
under seal, but document Q was not.
24
Instead of attaching the
Thus, these documents
The other two documents, G and Q, are attached to
Document G was previously filed
The Court finds that the information in document P is
25
confidential and orders that it be stricken from the public record
26
and returned to Petitioner.
27
is necessary for Petitioner's argument, but if he believes that it
It does not appear that this document
28
2
1
is, he may re-file it with a renewed motion to seal at the time he
2
files his traverse.
3
Documents Q and Z(7) do not contain confidential material;
4
therefore, the motion to seal them is denied.
5
document G under seal is denied as moot because it is already
6
under seal.
7
II. Amended Petition
8
9
In the interests of justice and judicial economy, the Court
accepts Petitioner's two amended petitions as one amended
10
petition.
11
United States District Court
The motion to file
in the amended petition are without merit.
12
the Court hereby issues the following orders:
13
1.
It does not appear that the claims Petitioner presents
Good cause appearing,
The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order
14
and the amended petition, doc. nos. 25 and 27, and all attachments
15
thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney
16
General of the State of California.
17
copy of this Order on Petitioner at his current address.
18
2.
The Clerk shall also serve a
No later than sixty days from the date of this Order,
19
Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner an
20
Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing
21
Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus
22
should not be issued.
23
portions of the state record that have been transcribed previously
24
and are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the
25
petition.
26
Respondent shall file with the Answer all
If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so
27
by filing a Traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent
28
no later than thirty days from his receipt of the Answer.
3
If he
1
does not do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready
2
for decision on the date the Traverse is due.
3
3.
No later than sixty days from the date of this Order,
4
Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner a
5
motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an Answer, as
6
set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules
7
Governing Section 2254 Cases.
8
If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with
the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of
10
non-opposition to the motion within twenty-eight days of receipt
11
United States District Court
9
of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve
12
on Petitioner a reply within fourteen days of receipt of an
13
opposition.
14
4.
It is Petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this
15
case.
16
change of address and comply with the Court’s orders in a timely
17
fashion.
18
communications with the Court by mailing a true copy of the
19
document to Respondent’s counsel.
20
He must keep the Court and Respondent informed of any
5.
He also must serve on Respondent’s counsel all
Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable
21
extensions will be granted.
22
must be filed no later than ten days prior to the deadline sought
23
to be extended.
24
6.
Any motion for an extension of time
Petitioner's motion to seal documents Q and Z(7) is
25
DENIED because they do not contain confidential information.
26
motion to seal document G is DENIED as moot because it has already
27
been filed under seal.
28
because the Court orders that it be stricken from the record.
The
The motion to seal document P is DENIED
4
If
1
Petitioner believes document P is necessary for his argument, he
2
is granted leave to re-file a motion to seal that is in conformity
3
with Civil Local Rule 79-5 with his traverse.
4
Court shall send Petitioner a copy of Civil Local Rule 79-5.
5
7.
The Clerk of the
Petitioner's request for two copies of his amended
6
petitions is granted.
7
copies.
8
documents shall be sent to him without payment of the Court's
9
copying costs.
However, Petitioner is put on notice that no further
10
8.
11
United States District Court
The Clerk of the Court shall send him these
IT IS SO ORDERED.
This Order terminates docket number 28.
12
13
14
Dated: 8/22/2014
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?