Cox v. California Forensic Medical Group (C.F.M.G) et al
Filing
37
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH ACCESS TO LEGAL RESEARCH AND TO PROVIDE HIM WITH LEGAL MATERIALS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/12/16. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DAN ANDREW COX,
Case No. 14-cv-04662-KAW (PR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ALISHA STOTTSBERRY, et al.,
Defendants.
Re: Dkt. No. 35
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH
ACCESS TO LEGAL RESEARCH AND
TO PROVIDE HIM WITH LEGAL
MATERIALS
12
13
On October 20, 2014, Plaintiff Dan Andrew Cox filed a civil rights action against
14
employees of the Lakeport County Jail. On May 7, 2015, the Court issued an order finding that
15
the amended complaint appeared to allege a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate
16
indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs against Medical Director Alisha Stottsberry and
17
Nurse Jim Miller. The Lakeport County Jail refused to accept service for these defendants
18
because they were contract employees. The Court had to request service by the United States
19
Marshal. Finally, on August 25, 2015, Defendants filed an answer to Plaintiff’s amended
20
complaint. Defendants have filed two motions for extensions of time to file a dispositive motion,
21
which the Court has granted.
22
On December 2, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to consolidate this case with Cox v.
23
Stottsberry, 15-4384 KAW (PR), a case filed by Plaintiff in state court and which Defendants
24
removed to this Court. Plaintiff’s opposition to this motion is due on January 13, 2016.
25
On December 3, 2015, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff stating that officials at the
26
Lake County Jail are denying him access to legal research and to writing materials such as a note
27
pad, legal tablet and legal envelopes so that he may do his research. He attaches a request he
28
made to the jail for such supplies, which was “denied per Captain Hosman.”
1
Plaintiff cannot reasonably be expected to respond to Defendants’ motion to consolidate
2
until he has access to legal research on this issue and writing implements with which to take notes
3
and write his response. Therefore, within fourteen days from the date of this Order, Defendants
4
are directed to ensure that Plaintiff is provided with such materials. Also, within fourteen days
5
from the date of this Order, Defendants are to file a declaration with this Court indicating that they
6
have provided Plaintiff with necessary legal research materials. If they cannot do so, they are
7
requested to file a declaration indicating why they cannot.
8
9
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to consolidate is stayed until Defendants have
provided him with the necessary materials. This Order also stays Plaintiff’s opposition to
Defendants’ motion to consolidate in case number 15-4384 KAW (PR). The Clerk is directed to
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
file this Order in that case as well as this case.
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/12/16
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?