Grimes v. Doe

Filing 1

ORDER RETURNING COMPLAINT TO PLAINTIFF. ***Civil Case Terminated***. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/29/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

JEROME L. GRIMES,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9
10

v.

No. C 14-80259M CW
ORDER RETURNING
COMPLAINT TO
PLAINTIFF

RONALD “RONNIE” (DOE), et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

On December 9, 2005, this Court entered a pre-filing order
11
regarding the cases filed by Plaintiff Jerome Grimes.

The pre-

12
filing order states that if Mr. Grimes files a complaint that is
13
“related to any of the following matters:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

(1) a diversified group of individuals who commit acts
of terror against Mr. Grimes, his family and other
citizens;
(2) an injunction against the defendants to prevent them
from kidnaping, framing, falsely imprisoning or
otherwise terrorizing Mr. Grimes, his family, and other
citizens;
(3) a court order for the defendants to be subjected to
a lie detector test;
(4) covert terrorism
it will not be filed unless it presents cognizable claims that are

22
not based on merely conclusory allegations.

Second, no other

23
complaints filed by Mr. Grimes while he is not incarcerated or
24
detained will be filed unless they contain intelligible factual
25
allegations and claims for relief.”
26
The Court has reviewed the above-captioned complaint filed by
27
Mr. Grimes and finds that it shall not be filed because it alleges
28

1

that Defendants are engaged in terrorism and seeks a court order

2

for Defendants to be subjected to a lie detector test.

3

alleges no cognizable causes of action in this complaint.

4

Mr. Grimes

Because the above-captioned complaint concerns multiple

5

matters mentioned in the pre-filing order and presents no

6

cognizable cause of action, the Clerk of the Court is ordered not

7

to file it.

8

Grimes.

9

Instead, the complaint shall be returned to Mr.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

Dated:

September 29, 2014

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2