Weiss v. City of Santa Rosa Police Department et al

Filing 68

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 66 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERRY L WEISS, Case No. 15-cv-01639-YGR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CITY OF SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 66 Defendants. 12 13 The Court has reviewed plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. 14 In contrast to criminal proceedings, there generally is no constitutional right to counsel in 15 civil actions. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 801 (9th Cir. 1986) (“There is 16 normally . . . no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case.”). This decision of whether to 17 request counsel is within the discretion of the district court and is “granted only in exceptional 18 circumstances.” See Agyeman v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) 19 (quoting Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984)). Deciding whether 20 “exceptional circumstances” exist requires an evaluation of the likelihood of plaintiff’s success on 21 the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his or her claims pro se in light of the 22 complexity of the legal issues. Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing 23 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)). 24 This case does not present an exceptional circumstance warranting the appointment of 25 counsel. Accordingly, plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. However, the 26 Court itself pays close attention to the legal issues addressed in the filing and has referred the 27 parties to a magistrate judge to attempt to resolve the matter without further legal proceedings. 28 The Court understands the difficulties that pro se litigants encounter and has available, 1 through the Court’s website, http://cand.uscourts.gov, a “Handbook for Pro Se Litigants,” which 2 contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney. The Court also advises 3 plaintiff that additional assistance may be available by making an appointment with the Legal 4 Help Center. There is no fee for this service. Please visit the Court’s website or call the phone 5 numbers listed below for current office hours, forms, and policies. 6 To make an appointment with the Legal Help Center in Oakland, plaintiff may visit the 7 Oakland Courthouse, located at 1301 Clay Street, Room 470S, Oakland, California, 94612, or call 8 (415) 782-8982. To make an appointment with the Legal Help Center in San Francisco, plaintiff may visit 10 the San Francisco Courthouse, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Room 2796, San 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 Francisco, California, 94102, or call (415) 782-8982. 12 To make an appointment with the Federal Legal Assistance Self-Help Center in San Jose, 13 plaintiff may visit the San Jose Federal Courthouse, located at 280 South 1st Street, 4th Floor, 14 Rooms 4093 & 4095, San Jose, California, 95113, or call (408) 297-1480. 15 This Order Terminates Docket Number 66. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: June 24, 2016 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?