Wilkins v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 105

Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion to Compel. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

EUREKA DIVISION

7
8

RUDY WILKINS,

Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (NJV)

Plaintiff,
9

ORDER RE MOTION
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v.
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 81

Defendants.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery filed February 2, 2017, (Doc. 81), came on for

14

hearing at San Quentin State Prison on June 27, 2017. Present at the hearing were Plaintiff Rudy

15

Wilkens, appearing pro se, and Counsel for Defendants, Matthew M. Grigg. Pursuant to the

16

rulings made at that hearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

17

Request No. 1: Granted in part. Defense Counsel to provide Plaintiff with policies regarding the

18

screening of inmates at the inmate intake processing centers.

19

Request No. 2: Denied. Plaintiff may obtain this information through the use of subpoenas

20

directed to third parties.

21

Request No. 3: Denied. Defense counsel represents that Plaintiff already has all of the

22

documentation relating to this request.

23

Request No. 4: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

24

custody or control of Defendants.

25

Request No. 5: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

26

custody or control of Defendants.

27

Request No. 6: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

28

custody or control of Defendants.

1

Request No. 7: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

2

custody or control of Defendants.

3

Request No. 8: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

4

custody or control of Defendants.

5

Request No. 9: Granted in part. Defense counsel is to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding

6

training in the area of dermatology.

7

Request No. 10: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding

8

training in the area of corrective surgery for inguinal hernia.

9

Request No. 11: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding
training in the area of shoulder surgery.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Request No. 12: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding

12

training in emergency medical evacuation.

13

Request No. 13: Granted in part. Defense counsel to produce all grievances relating to delay and

14

denial of health care of Plaintiff that are within the care, custody and control of Defendants.

15

Request No. 14: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

16

custody or control of Defendants.

17

Request No. 15: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

18

custody or control of Defendants.

19

Request No. 16: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care,

20

custody or control of Defendants.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 7, 2017
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27
28
2