Stribling v. Brown et al

Filing 46

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL; REOPENING ACTION; AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Attorney Rye (Ryan) P. Murphy,David Blake Newdorf,Taeva Cantor Shefler for Aaron Lamont Stribling added. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/2/2017 0 2:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Further proceedings stayed four weeks from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/10/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 2 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 3 4 AARON LAM A MONT STRI IBLING, Case No.15 5-cv-03337-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFIC CATE OF S SERVICE 6 7 8 CORRECTIO ONAL OFFIC CER S. PICA AZO, et al l., Defendants s. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 I, the un ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S. ee ice Dis strict Court, Northern Di istrict of Cal lifornia. That on 7/10/2017, I SERVED a true and c n correct copy( (ies) of the a attached, by p placing said cop py(ies) in a postage paid envelope ad p d ddressed to t person(s) hereinafter listed, by d the ) r depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said c i M copy(ies) int an inter-office deliver receptacle to ry e cated in the Clerk's office C e. loc 14 15 16 Aaron Lamont Strib L bling ID: G-40745 C.S.P. Sac - New Folsom S F P.O. Bo 290066 ox Represa CA 95671 a, 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 B David Blake Newdorf Ryan P. Murphy Newdor Legal rf 630 Tho omas L. Ber rkley Way, Ste. 103 S Oakland, CA 94612 2 Taeva Cantor Shefl C ler PO Box 40567 x San Fra ancisco, CA 94140-0567 7 23 24 Su usan Y. Soon ng Cl lerk, United States Distr Court d rict 25 26 27 28 By y:_________ ___________ _______ Fr rances Stone Deputy Cl e, lerk to the H Honorable YV VONNE GO ONZALEZ R ROGERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?