Raval v. America's Servicing Company et al

Filing 12

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2015 is CONTINUED to Monday, 2/29/2016 02:00 PM before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/3/15. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 DENNISON RAVAL, 9 Plaintiff, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No.: 15-CV-4030 YGR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 13 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2(a) and 16-9, Plaintiff was required to serve a copy of the 15 order setting the initial case management conference along with the summons and complaint, and to 16 file a joint or separate case management statement no less than seven days prior to the conference. 17 Pro se Plaintiff Dennison Raval filed the present lawsuit on September 3, 2015. Plaintiff has not 18 yet filed proof of service upon Defendants America’s Servicing Company and NDEX West LLC 19 20 (“Defendants”) and has not filed a case management statement in advance of the initial case 21 management conference set for December 7, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 11.) No such case 22 management statement has been filed, and it appears that Defendants have not yet been served. 23 The case management conference currently set for December 7, 2015, is CONTINUED to 24 25 26 27 28 February 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland. Plaintiff is cautioned that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires the filing of proof of service of Defendants with a summons and complaint no later than January 1, 2016. See F.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (under version of rule in effect at the time of filing, service required within 120 1 days). If Plaintiff fails to serve the summons and complaint, or to file a motion for extension of 2 time to serve setting forth good cause reasons why Defendants have not yet been served, by January 3 1, 2016, the complaint herein will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: December 3, 2015 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?