Raval v. America's Servicing Company et al

Filing 12

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2015 is CONTINUED to Monday, 2/29/2016 02:00 PM before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/3/15. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8

DENNISON RAVAL,

9

Plaintiff,

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Case No.: 15-CV-4030 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2(a) and 16-9, Plaintiff was required to serve a copy of the

15

order setting the initial case management conference along with the summons and complaint, and to

16

file a joint or separate case management statement no less than seven days prior to the conference.

17

Pro se Plaintiff Dennison Raval filed the present lawsuit on September 3, 2015. Plaintiff has not

18

yet filed proof of service upon Defendants America’s Servicing Company and NDEX West LLC
19
20

(“Defendants”) and has not filed a case management statement in advance of the initial case

21

management conference set for December 7, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 11.) No such case

22

management statement has been filed, and it appears that Defendants have not yet been served.

23

The case management conference currently set for December 7, 2015, is CONTINUED to

24
25
26
27
28

February 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland.
Plaintiff is cautioned that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires the filing of proof
of service of Defendants with a summons and complaint no later than January 1, 2016. See
F.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (under version of rule in effect at the time of filing, service required within 120

1

days). If Plaintiff fails to serve the summons and complaint, or to file a motion for extension of

2

time to serve setting forth good cause reasons why Defendants have not yet been served, by January

3

1, 2016, the complaint herein will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: December 3, 2015

_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2