Warner v. Tileston et al

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 61 Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Opposition to 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/5/2018. Replies due by 2/19/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EARL WARNER, Case No. 16-cv-04100-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 C. TILESTON, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 61. Having read and considered Plaintiff’s request, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. This Order terminates Docket No. 61. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2018 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?