Warner v. Tileston et al
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 61 Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Opposition to 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/5/2018. Replies due by 2/19/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 16-cv-04100-YGR (PR)
C. TILESTON, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff has filed a request for a second extension of time in which to file his opposition to
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 61. Having read and considered Plaintiff’s
request, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a second extension of time is
GRANTED. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment will be extended up to and including twenty-eight (28) days from the date of
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff’s
opposition is filed.
This Order terminates Docket No. 61.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 9, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?