Balik v. Sprint, Inc et al

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 79 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JEREMIAH W. BALIK,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.16-cv-05101-HSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

v.
TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 79

Defendants.

12
13

On December 20, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Jeremiah W. Balik’s purported

14

discrimination action with prejudice and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 71,

15

72. Plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit the next day. Dkt. No. 73. In response to a notice of

16

referral from the Ninth Circuit, the Court issued an order revoking Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

17

status. Dkt. No. 75. The Ninth Circuit later dismissed the appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

18

§ 1915(e)(2). See Dkt. No. 78. Plaintiff then filed a “Motion for IFP Reconsideration” with this

19

Court on May 1, 2017. Dkt. No. 79. Because this motion is not properly before the Court, the

20

Court DENIES the motion. The Court reminds Plaintiff that the Court dismissed this action with

21

prejudice and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 71, 72. The case is now closed

22

and no further filings will be accepted.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: 5/19/2017

25
26
27
28

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge