Balik v. Sprint, Inc et al

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 79 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEREMIAH W. BALIK, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No.16-cv-05101-HSG ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 79 Defendants. 12 13 On December 20, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Jeremiah W. Balik’s purported 14 discrimination action with prejudice and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 71, 15 72. Plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit the next day. Dkt. No. 73. In response to a notice of 16 referral from the Ninth Circuit, the Court issued an order revoking Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis 17 status. Dkt. No. 75. The Ninth Circuit later dismissed the appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 18 § 1915(e)(2). See Dkt. No. 78. Plaintiff then filed a “Motion for IFP Reconsideration” with this 19 Court on May 1, 2017. Dkt. No. 79. Because this motion is not properly before the Court, the 20 Court DENIES the motion. The Court reminds Plaintiff that the Court dismissed this action with 21 prejudice and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 71, 72. The case is now closed 22 and no further filings will be accepted. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: 5/19/2017 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?