Shavers v. Murphy

Filing 31

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/3/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 24, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/24/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 CYNTHIA SHAVERS, Case No. 16-cv-05421-DMR Plaintiff, 6 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 7 8 MICHAEL MURPHY, Defendant. 9 10 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on August 10, 2017. Plaintiff Cynthia Shavers is pursuing this action without legal 12 representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in 13 opposition to Defendant’s motion by July 14, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received 14 no such opposition. 15 The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by August 3, 2017 and explain her failure to 16 respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit her opposition to the 17 court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not 18 indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not 19 respond by August 3, 2017, Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for 20 failure to prosecute. The August 10, 2017 hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. The court IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 ______________________________________ Ryu Donna a M.Ryu onn M. Judge D United States Magistrate Judge RT ER H 28 D RDERE OO IT IS S NO 27 Dated: July 24, 2017 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T FO 25 S will reschedule a hearing if appropriate. RT U O 24 R NIA 23 opposition no later than August 10, 2017. LI 22 The court further ORDERS that Defendant shall file a reply, if any, to Plaintiff’s A 21 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?