Shavers v. Murphy
Filing
31
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/3/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 24, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/24/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CYNTHIA SHAVERS,
Case No. 16-cv-05421-DMR
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
7
8
MICHAEL MURPHY,
Defendant.
9
10
Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a
court hearing on August 10, 2017. Plaintiff Cynthia Shavers is pursuing this action without legal
12
representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in
13
opposition to Defendant’s motion by July 14, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received
14
no such opposition.
15
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by August 3, 2017 and explain her failure to
16
respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit her opposition to the
17
court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not
18
indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not
19
respond by August 3, 2017, Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for
20
failure to prosecute.
The August 10, 2017 hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. The court
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
______________________________________
Ryu
Donna a M.Ryu
onn M.
Judge D
United States Magistrate Judge
RT
ER
H
28
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
NO
27
Dated: July 24, 2017
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
FO
25
S
will reschedule a hearing if appropriate.
RT
U
O
24
R NIA
23
opposition no later than August 10, 2017.
LI
22
The court further ORDERS that Defendant shall file a reply, if any, to Plaintiff’s
A
21
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?