Renowitzky v. Zieve, Brodnax & Steel, LLP et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND VACATING SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Show Cause Response due by 9/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on September 1, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/1/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dtmS, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 17-cv-02309-DMR
ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEEL, LLP, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 8
On April 25, 2017, Pro se Plaintiff Carl Renowitsky filed suit in this Court. [Docket No.
1.] Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Mr. Renowitsky was required to serve the
summons and complaint on the defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(m). It does not appear that Mr. Renowitsky has served the defendants with the
summons and complaint as no proofs of service have been filed.
On August 1, 2017, the court ordered Mr. Renowitsky to file a Joint Case Management
Conference Statement by August 30, 2017. [Docket No. 8]. No Joint Case Management
Conference Statement has been filed.
Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Renowitsky to respond in writing by September 6,
2017 and explain why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to
respond by September 6, 2017 may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.
The court VACATES the September 6, 2017 Case Management Conference.
Donna M. Ryuu
United Donna M.
udge States Magistrate Judge
IT IS S
Dated: September 1, 2017
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND
VACATING SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 CASE
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?