Hughes v. Livingston

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 11/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/11/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDRE D. HUGHES, Petitioner, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 9 10 DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 17-cv-02569-KAW (PR) Respondent. 12 13 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 14 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asserting the violation of his right to a speedy trial and ineffective assistance of 15 counsel. Petitioner has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate 16 Judge over this action. Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee. 17 18 19 It does not appear from the face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the petition and all 20 attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the 21 State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at his current 22 address. 23 2. No later than sixty days from the date of this Order, Respondent shall file with this 24 Court and serve upon Petitioner an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules 25 Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. 26 Respondent shall file with the Answer all portions of the state record that have been transcribed 27 previously and are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition. If Petitioner 28 wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse with the Court and serving it 1 on Respondent within thirty days of his receipt of the Answer. If he does not do so, the petition 2 will be deemed submitted and ready for decision on the date the Traverse is due. 3 3. No later than sixty days from the date of this Order, Respondent may file with this 4 Court and serve upon Petitioner a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an Answer, 5 as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 6 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on 7 Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within thirty days of 8 receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply 9 within fourteen days of receipt of an opposition. 10 4. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the Court United States District Court Northern District of California 11 informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the Clerk headed “Notice of 12 Change of Address,” and must comply with the Court's orders in a timely fashion. He also must 13 serve on Respondent’s counsel all communications with the Court by mailing a true copy of the 14 document to Respondent’s counsel. 15 5. Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted. 16 Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than three days prior to the deadline 17 sought to be extended. 18 19 20 6. Respondent shall file his Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction on or before the date his answer is due. This form can be found at 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?