Henderson v. Lewis et al
Filing
68
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DARREN HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
J. LEWIS, et al.,
Case No. 17-cv-06977-HSG
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON
APPEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 67
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff, a California prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
14
1983. Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion requesting leave to proceed in forma
15
pauperis on appeal. The Court has already denied plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
16
appeal on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. See Dkt. No. 66 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3);
17
Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002)). The pending motion appears
18
to be a copy of the initial motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt.
19
No. 63), but with a prison trust account statement attached. Plaintiff’s second request for leave to
20
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is therefore DENIED for the same reasons as the initial
21
request was denied. See Dkt. No. 66.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This order terminates Dkt. No 67. This case remains closed. The Clerk shall transmit a
copy of this order to the Court of Appeals.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/10/2019
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?