Crawford v. Ducart
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/7/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2019)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
CHRISTOPHER LEE CRAWFORD,
Case No. 18-cv-05141-YGR (PR)
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
v.
6
7
C. E. DUCART,
Defendant.
8
9
This suit was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent
Ninth Circuit decision.1 On August 22, 2018, Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed an incomplete pro se
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
prisoner complaint form under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which was mostly blank except for the caption,
12
place of confinement, and grievance procedure acknowledgement on the first page as well as the
13
date/signature on the last page. See Dkt. 1. On that same date, Plaintiff submitted to the Court an
14
incomplete in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application, which was mostly blank except for the caption
15
on the first page and the date/signature on the last page. Dkt. 2. He also attached his six-month
16
prisoner trust account statement, but he did not provide his Certificate of Funds. See id.
17
On September 14, 2018, the Clerk of the Court sent a notification to Plaintiff informing
18
him that he had not paid the filing fee and the IFP application he submitted was incomplete (the
19
form was blank, and he had not submitted his Certificate of Funds). Dkt. 6. The Clerk provided
20
Plaintiff with a blank IFP application form, along with a return envelope, instructions, and a
21
notification that the case would be dismissed if Plaintiff failed to pay the fee or file the completed
22
application within twenty-eight days.
On September 21, 2018, the Clerk sent another notification to Plaintiff explaining that his
23
24
complaint form was incomplete. Dkt. 7. The Clerk provided Plaintiff with a copy of a blank
25
complaint form, along with a return envelope, instructions, and a notification that the case would
26
27
28
1
Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017) (magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction
to dismiss case on initial screening because unserved defendants had not consented to proceed
before magistrate judge).
1
be dismissed if Plaintiff failed to submit a completed complaint on form within twenty-eight days.
2
To date, Plaintiff has failed to submit a completed complaint form, and the time to do so has
3
passed. The Court notes that on October 3, 2018, Plaintiff had sent a letter to the Clerk explaining
4
that he “had already submitted a 9 page Amended Complaint.” Dkt. 8. However, no such
5
amended complaint was attached to that October 3, 2018 letter. See id. And nothing in the record
6
indicates that such an amended complaint had ever been filed in this case.
On October 4, 2018, Plaintiff sent a letter to the Clerk indicating that he was attempting to
7
8
submit a completed IFP application, but prison officials in the trust account office had “delayed”
9
the processing of his IFP application. Dkt. 9 at 1.
On October 5, 2018, the Clerk of the Court sent a second notification to Plaintiff again
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
informing him that he had neither paid the filing fee nor filed a completed IFP application. Dkt.
12
10. The Clerk once again provided Plaintiff with a blank IFP application form, along with a return
13
envelope, instructions, and a notification that the case would be dismissed if Plaintiff failed to pay
14
the fee or file the completed application within twenty-eight days.
On October 9, 2018, Plaintiff submitted to the Court a filled-out IFP application and his
15
16
six-month prisoner trust account statement, but his Certificate of Funds was not included.
Thereafter, as indicated above, this case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. Dkts.
17
18
19
12, 13.
The twenty-eight-day deadline to submit his Certificate of Funds has passed, and Plaintiff
20
has failed to do so. As mentioned, Plaintiff has also failed to submit a completed complaint form
21
by the October 29, 2018 deadline, which passed more than sixty days ago. Nor does the record
22
show that Plaintiff actually filed a “9-page Amended Complaint” as he had indicated in his
23
October 3, 2018 letter. See Dkt. 8.
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s IFP
application is DENIED as incomplete. The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2019
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?