Rutledge v. Hatton et al

Filing 30

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING ( 28 , 29 ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. Responses due by 11/8/2019 and Replies due by 11/22/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THOMAS L. RUTLEDGE,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 18-cv-05530-HSG
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO OPPOSITION TO
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

v.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29

P. LAM,
Defendant.

12
13

Good cause being shown, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition

14

to the summary judgment motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition by November

15

8, 2019. The reply brief shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the

16

opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No

17

hearing will be held on the motion.

18

This order terminates Dkt. Nos. 28 and 29.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 10/10/2019
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge