Rutledge v. Hatton et al
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING ( 28 , 29 ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. Responses due by 11/8/2019 and Replies due by 11/22/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS L. RUTLEDGE,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 18-cv-05530-HSG
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO OPPOSITION TO
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29
Good cause being shown, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition
to the summary judgment motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition by November
8, 2019. The reply brief shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the
opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No
hearing will be held on the motion.
This order terminates Dkt. Nos. 28 and 29.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?