State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 192

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule on Claims Related to 10 U.S.C. § 2808 and the Treasury Forfeiture Fund filed by Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ryan D. McCarthy, Steven T. Mnuchin, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson, and Plaintiff States. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 7/8/2019) Modified on 7/9/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

1
2
3
4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

5
6
7
8

No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG

Plaintiffs,
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON CLAIMS
RELATED TO 10 U.S.C.
§ 2808 AND THE TREASURY
FORFEITURE FUND

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation submitted on July 8, 2019, and for good
cause shown, the Court hereby orders:
(1) The summary judgment briefing schedule set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order
(ECF No. 174) is stayed for the claims based on 10 U.S.C. § 2808;
(2) The parties shall submit a proposed schedule for briefing the section 2808 claims

18

within 10 days of a decision by the Acting Secretary of Defense to authorize border barrier

19

construction pursuant to that authority;

20
21

(3) The summary judgment briefing schedule set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order
(ECF No. 174) for the Treasury Forfeiture Fund claims is modified as follows:

22
23

July 18

24

August 1

25
26
27
28

August 15
August 22

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment
Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment
Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ Cross-Motions for
Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendants’ Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for
Summary Judgment

State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG –Proposed Order
1

1
2

(4) The motion hearing set for August 29, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. remains as scheduled to
address the Treasury Forfeiture Fund claims.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED: July ___, 2019
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG –Proposed Order
2