State of California et al v. Trump et al

Filing 202

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing without Prejudice TFF Claims filed by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, Dana Nessel, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin and Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Dismissing Without Prejudice TFF Claims)(Sherman, Lee) (Filed on 8/2/2019) Modified on 8/5/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/5/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

OAKLAND DIVISION

12
13
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.;

Case No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’
v.
CLAIMS RELATING TO TREASURY
FORFEITURE FUND
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam,
as President of the United States of America Judge:
Jr.
et al.;
Trial Date:
None Set
Action Filed: February 18, 2019
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Dismissing Without Prejudice Claims Re: TFF (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)

1

Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation submitted on July XX, 2019, and for good

2

cause shown, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiffs’ claims as they pertain to Defendants’ use of

3

$601 million from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund under 31 U.S.C. § 9705 to fund the construction

4

of a wall on the United States-Mexico border are dismissed without prejudice. This order does

5

not impact any other claims at issue that have yet to be adjudicated to final judgment in this case,

6

specifically Plaintiffs’ claims as they pertain to the diversion of funds via 10 U.S.C. § 2808 and

7

the alleged violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.

8
9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED.
Dated: __________________

11
__________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[Proposed] Order Dismissing Without Prejudice Claims Re: TFF (4:19-cv-00872-HSG)