State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
206
NOTICE of Decision by the Department of Defense to Authorize Border Barrier Projects Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808 by Department of Defense, David Bernhardt, Mark T. Esper, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ryan D. McCarthy, Steven T. Mnuchin, Richard V. Spencer, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Treasury, United States of America, Heather Wilson (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Warden, Andrew) (Filed on 9/3/2019) Modified on 9/4/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
JAMES M. BURNHAM
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
ALEXANDER K. HAAS
Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANDREW I. WARDEN (IN #23840-49)
Senior Trial Counsel
KATHRYN C. DAVIS
MICHAEL J. GERARDI
LESLIE COOPER VIGEN
RACHAEL WESTMORELAND
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
1100 L Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel.: (202) 616-5084
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Attorneys for Defendants
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15
16
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
SIERRA CLUB, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
25
26
27
28
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 4:19-cv-00872-HSG
No. 4:19-cv-00892-HSG
NOTICE OF DECISION BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO
AUTHORIZE BORDER BARRIER
PROJECTS PURSUANT TO 10
U.S.C. § 2808
1
Defendants hereby notify the Court and parties in the above-captioned cases that, on
2
September 3, 2019, the Secretary of Defense authorized eleven border barrier projects in
3
California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808. A description of the
4
project locations and estimated cost of each project is attached as Exhibit 1. See Memorandum
5
from the Secretary of Defense re: Guidance for Undertaking Military Construction Projects
6
Pursuant to Section 2808 of Title 10, U.S. Code (Sept. 3, 2019). In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
7
§ 2808(b), the Secretary of Defense has notified Congress of his decision to undertake military
8
construction projects authorized by Section 2808. See, e.g., Letter from Secretary of Defense
9
Mark Esper to Sen. James Inhofe (Sept. 3, 2019) (attached as Exhibit 2).
10
To fund these projects, the Secretary of Defense has authorized the Department of the
11
Army to expend up to $3.6 billion in unobligated military construction funds. See id. The
12
Secretary of Defense has further directed that, initially, only funds associated with deferred
13
military construction projects located outside of the United States will be provided to the
14
Department of the Army. See id. Deferred military construction projects outside of the United
15
States account for $1.8 billion of the required funds. See id. The remaining $1.8 billion
16
associated with deferred military construction projects located in the United States (including
17
U.S. territories) will be made available to the Secretary of the Army when it is needed for
18
obligation. See id. Defendants will provide the Court and parties with the list of unobligated
19
military construction projects currently identified for deferral as soon as congressional
20
notifications are complete but no later than Friday, September 6, 2019.
21
The timeline for obligating funds and beginning construction of the Section 2808 projects
22
depends on type of expenditure and the project’s location. See Declaration of Brigadier General
23
Glenn Goddard ¶¶ 7–12 (attached as Exhibit 3). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
24
has identified four types of expenditures associated with the projects. See id. ¶¶ 7–10. First,
25
USACE expects to begin incurring project-related administrative costs as soon as funds are made
26
available. See id. ¶ 7. These costs include labor costs for USACE employees, travel costs, and
27
other overhead costs related to the approved projects. Id. Because it has not yet identified the
28
number of personnel or the amount of their time needed to manage these projects, USACE is
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
1
1
unable to provide a precise estimate of the amount of money it would need for these
2
administrative costs. Id. USACE is developing a staffing plan and a precise budget for its
3
administrative costs, but based on experience from other border barrier projects, once fully
4
staffed, USACE estimates the likely administrative costs will be approximately $1 million per
5
week. Id.
6
Second, USACE estimates it will spend approximately $500,000 on costs associated with
7
initial real estate activities necessary to acquire or obtain administrative jurisdiction of land not
8
currently under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (DoD). See id. ¶ 8. Some of the
9
project areas are on land not currently under the control of DoD, thus DoD must acquire
10
administrative jurisdiction over the land and add it to the Department of the Army’s real property
11
inventory, either as a new military installation or as part of an existing military installation. See
12
Exhibit 1. As part of that process, USACE must acquire, among other things, preliminary title
13
evidence on all lands necessary for the projects. See Goddard Decl. ¶ 7. USACE expects to
14
begin obligating and expending funds for this category of expenses starting on September 23 and
15
continuing over the course of the next several months. See id.
16
Third, USACE will use funds made available for the approved Section 2808 projects to
17
provide just compensation to landowners for land acquired through negotiated purchases or
18
condemnation, for payments of relocation assistance benefits, and for the provision of substitute
19
facilities, where appropriate. See id. ¶ 9. USACE does not expect to expend any funds for these
20
purposes before April 2020. Id.
21
Fourth, USACE will use Section 2808 funds for barrier constriction contracts. See id.
22
¶ 10. The timeline for obligating funds for construction contracts and beginning construction
23
depends on the location of each project. Id. The project locations generally fall into three
24
categories, as explained below.
25
A. Projects on the Barry M. Goldwater Range
26
Two border barrier projects (Yuma 2 and Yuma 10/27) are located on the Barry M.
27
Goldwater Range, an existing military installation in Arizona that is under the administrative
28
jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. See id. ¶ 10.a. USACE will not award a contract
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
2
1
(thereby obligating funds for all contract costs) for border barrier construction on the Goldwater
2
Range earlier than October 3, 2019. Id. The contract for these two barrier-construction projects
3
is estimated to cost $567 million. Id. No ground-disturbing activities, including geotechnical
4
borings and clearing and grubbing, will occur before 20 days after the date of contract award. Id.
5
The earliest date on which substantial construction could occur for these projects is 40 days after
6
contract award. Id.
B. Projects on Federal Public Domain Land
7
8
9
There are seven projects located, at least in part, on Federal public domain land currently
under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior. See id. ¶ 10.b. The
10
projects and estimated costs are: Yuma 3 ($630 million); Yuma 6 ($65 million); San Diego 4
11
($67 million); San Diego 11 ($57 million); El Paso 2 ($476 million); El Paso 8 ($164 million);
12
and El Centro 9 ($286 million). Id. Yuma 3 and San Diego 4 are exclusively on Federal public
13
land. Id. The remaining five projects involve various combination of Federal public domain
14
land; Federal non-public domain land that can be transferred between Federal agencies under the
15
Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (the Property Act); and
16
non-Federal land.1 The Department of the Army anticipates obtaining administrative jurisdiction
17
over the portions of these seven projects that are on Federal public domain land no earlier than
18
30 days after the Secretary’s decision. Id. The processes required for USACE to obtain
19
jurisdiction over Federal non-public domain land and non-Federal land will require additional
20
time and are not expected to conclude before April 2020. Id. The earliest date on which USACE
21
could award a construction contract and obligate funds for any of these projects is 30 days after
22
the Department of the Army has accepted administrative jurisdiction and recorded the property
23
in its records as a military installation. Id. USACE would not need to acquire all of the land in a
24
project area before awarding a contract and may proceed with contract award for a project once
25
some portion of the land is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.
26
27
28
1
USACE’s understanding of the current land status of the seven project areas is based on
the best information available at this time. See Goddard Decl. ¶ 10.b.
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
3
1
Id. USACE anticipates that the construction contracts for Yuma 3 and San Diego 4 will be the
2
first of these seven projects ready for award and obligation. Id. The earliest date on which any
3
ground-disturbing activities could occur for these projects is 20 days after contract award. Id.
4
The earliest date on which substantial construction could occur for these projects is 40 days after
5
contract award. Id.
6
7
C. Projects Exclusively on Non-Public Land
The remaining two projects (El Centro 5 and Laredo 7) are located entirely on Federal
8
non-public domain land and non-Federal land. See id. ¶ 10.c. To obtain administrative
9
jurisdiction over non-Federal land will require either purchase or condemnation. Id. As
10
explained above, USACE does not expect to expend funds for either purchase or condemnation
11
before April 2020. Id. Similarly, USACE does not expect to obtain jurisdiction of Federal non-
12
public domain land before April 2020. Id. The earliest date on which the Task Force could
13
award a construction contract for these projects is 30 days after the Department of the Army has
14
recorded the property in its records as a military installation. Id. The earliest date on which any
15
ground-disturbing activities could occur for these projects is 20 days after contract award. Id.
16
The earliest date on which substantial construction could occur for these projects is 40 days after
17
contract award. Id. The estimated costs for construction of these projects is $20 million for El
18
Centro 5 and $1.268 billion for Laredo 7. Id.
19
20
***
In sum, the soonest any ground disturbing activity will begin for any of the Section 2808
21
projects is October 23, 2019 for the two projects on BMGR (Yuma 2 and Yuma 10/27). Id. ¶ 11.
22
The Corps anticipates that ground disturbing activities for the Yuma 3 and San Diego 4 projects
23
would begin next, approximately 30 days later. Id. The timetable for ground disturbing
24
activities on the remaining projects is uncertain, but will not occur earlier than as indicated for
25
Yuma 2, Yuma 10/27, Yuma 3, and San Diego 4. Id.
26
With respect to the obligation of funds, money for the projects will be drawn initially
27
only from funds associated with deferred military construction projects located outside of the
28
United States. See Exhibit 2. The Corps will begin immediately incurring project-related
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
4
1
administrative costs that are expected to be no more than $1 million per week. See Goddard
2
Decl. ¶ 12. Beginning no sooner than September 23, 2019, the Corps will start expending
3
additional funds, not expected to exceed $500,000, on initial real estate activities necessary to
4
acquire or obtain administrative jurisdiction of non-DoD land. Id. The earliest contract award
5
and obligation of funds for construction will occur no sooner than October 3, 2019, for the two
6
projects on BMGR (Yuma 2 and Yuma 10/27), which are estimated to cost $567 million. Id. It
7
is expected that the next construction contracts to be awarded and obligated will be Yuma 3
8
($630 million) and San Diego 4 ($67 million), approximately 30 day later. Id. The timetable for
9
award and obligation of the remaining contracts is uncertain, but will not occur earlier than as
10
indicated for Yuma 2, Yuma 10/27, Yuma 3, and San Diego 4. Id.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATE: September 3, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
JAMES M. BURNHAM
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
ALEXANDER K. HAAS
Director, Federal Programs Branch
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Director, Federal Programs Branch
/s/ Andrew I. Warden
ANDREW I. WARDEN (IN #23840-49)
Senior Trial Counsel
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
1100 L Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel.: (202) 616-5084
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Attorneys for Defendants
27
28
State of California, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00872-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
Sierra Club et. al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., 4:19-cv-00892-HSG – Notice of § 2808 Projects
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?