State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
244
Consent MOTION to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Andy Barr. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2019 10:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr. Responses due by 11/18/2019. Replies due by 11/25/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Amicus Memo of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Joseph, Lawrence) (Filed on 11/4/2019) Modified on 11/5/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
Amicus Curiae
Plaintiffs
AMICUS CURIAE
Defendants.
AMICUS CURIAE
Amicus Curiae
AMICUS CURIAE
Abbott Labs. v. Gardner
Air Courier Conference v. Am. Postal Workers Union
Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes
Allen v. Wright,
Ass’n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs., Inc. v. Camp
Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist.
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Reich
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
Coal. for Econ. Equity v. Wilson
Ctr. for Competitive Politics v. Harris
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
Dep’t of Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
Diamond v. Charles
Ex parte Young
Flast v. Cohen
Gray v. Powell,
AMICUS CURIAE
Hardin v. Ky. Utils. Co.
Heckler v. Chaney,
Heckler v. Lopez
In re Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig.
In re Fed.-Mogul Glob.
Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee,
Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.
Lane v. Pena
Lewis v. Casey,
Linda R.S. v. Richard D.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,
Lujan v. Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n
McConnell v. FEC
Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms
Mount Evans Co. v. Madigan
Mountain States Legal Found. v. Glickman,
Muskrat v. United States
Nader v. Saxbe
Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife
AMICUS CURIAE
Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.,
PG&E Co. v. Cal. ex rel. Cal. Dep’t of Toxic Substances Control
Puerto Rico v. Franklin Cal. Tax-Free Tr.
Schlesinger v. Reservists Comm. to Stop the War
Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.,
Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.
Sierra Club v. Morton
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t.,
Texas v. United States
Trump v. Sierra Club
United States v. Apel
United States v. Lee
United States v. Will
Univ. of Tex. v. Camenisch
Valley Forge Christian Coll. v. Ams. United for Separation of Church & State, Inc.,
Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. v. United States ex rel. Stevens
Wadley S. R. Co. v. Georgia
Yakus v. United States
Youngberg v. Romeo
AMICUS CURIAE
AMICUS CURIAE
“Nonreviewable Administrative Action,”
AMICUS CURIAE
i.e.
See
AMICUS CURIAE
Amicus curiae
Amicus
AMICUS CURIAE
Univ. of Tex. v. Camenisch
Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.
Camenisch
Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. Dist.
Kokkonen
v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.
Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee,
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t.,
Muskrat v. United
States
AMICUS CURIAE
Allen v. Wright,
Lujan v.
Defenders of Wildlife,
Lewis v. Casey,
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
See e.g. Valley Forge Christian Coll.
v. Ams. United for Separation of Church & State, Inc.,
Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.,
Mountain States Legal Found. v. Glickman,
someone else’s
Schlesinger v. Reservists Comm. to Stop the War
someone
AMICUS CURIAE
Valley
Forge Christian Coll.
Valley Forge
Christian Coll.
Sierra Club v. Morton
legally protected interest
Defenders of Wildlife
Valley Forge Christian College
Morton supra
qui tam
interests
legally protected
id.
Id.
Envtl. Litig.
In re Border Infrastructure
accord id.
infra
AMICUS CURIAE
qui tam
An interest unrelated to injury in fact is
insufficient to give a plaintiff standing
qui tam
Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. v. United States ex rel. Stevens
accord McConnell v. FEC
necessarily
Diamond v. Charles
qui tam
i.e.
qui tam
Flast v. Cohen
See e.g. Nader v. Saxbe
Stevens
qui tam
Stevens
Linda R.S. v. Richard D.
Flast
Stevens
Stevens
legally protected interest
AMICUS CURIAE
McConnell
Hardin v. Ky. Utils. Co.
Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes
Ickes
Stevens McConnell
Hardin
Diamond
arguendo
but see
supra
his
upon him
Air Courier Conference v. Am. Postal Workers Union
AMICUS CURIAE
statute
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States
Mount Evans Co. v. Madigan
Lujan v. Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n
See
Amicus
cf.
unobligated
Texas v. United
States
AMICUS CURIAE
Dep’t of Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
Lane v. Pena
Trump v. Sierra Club
accord id.
accord id.
AMICUS CURIAE
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v.
Volpe
overruled on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders
Heckler v.
Chaney,
Gray v. Powell,
Nonreviewable Administrative Action,
Panama Canal Co. v. Grace
Line, Inc.,
Abbott Labs. v. Gardner
See Ass’n of Data Processing Serv. Orgs., Inc. v. Camp
supra
ultra vires
could
AMICUS CURIAE
See e.g. United States v. Lee
Ex parte Young
v. Romeo
Youngberg
cf. Wadley S. R. Co. v. Georgia
Ickes
damnum absque injuria
Id.
Canadian Lumber
Trade
Mount Evans Co.
see also
See
but see
AMICUS CURIAE
supra
supra
express
PG&E Co. v. Cal. ex rel. Cal. Dep’t of Toxic
Substances Control
accord In re Fed.-Mogul Glob.
Chamber of
Commerce of the United States v. Reich
Puerto Rico v. Franklin Cal. Tax-Free Tr.
Id.
See
United States v. Apel
military jurisdiction
these projects i.e.
AMICUS CURIAE
Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife
id.
United States v. Will
Tenn. Valley Auth. v. Hill
new DHS appropriation
AMICUS CURIAE
See
AMICUS CURIAE
see
See
supra
supra
See
AMICUS CURIAE
supra
Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms
Heckler v. Lopez
See
supra
Ctr. for Competitive Politics v.
Harris
Coal. for Econ. Equity v. Wilson
See
supra
Yakus
v. United States
AMICUS CURIAE
see
supra
/s/ Lawrence J. Joseph
Counsel for Amicus Curiae
AMICUS CURIAE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?