Albert's Organics, Inc. v. Holzman et al

Filing 66

Discovery Order. In the attached order, the court denies the pending discovery motions without prejudice and orders the parties to comply with the dispute procedures in the court's standing order. This process allows an earlier resolution tha n the standard hearing under the local rules that occurs five weeks after a motion is filed. Also, given the nature of the dispute, the court expects the parties to try to work this out. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/17/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

1
2

STANDING ORDER FOR
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER
(Effective October 17, 2018)

3
4
5

Parties must comply with the procedures in the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure,

6

the local rules, the general orders, this standing order, and the Northern District’s standing order

7

for civil cases titled “Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.” These rules and a summary

8

of electronic-filing requirements (including the procedures for emailing proposed orders to

9

chambers) are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Rules” or “ECF-PACER”). A
failure to comply with any of the rules may be a ground for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

judgment, or other appropriate sanctions.

12

I. CALENDAR DATES AND SCHEDULING

13

Motions are heard each Thursday: civil motions at 9:30 a.m. and criminal motions at 10:30

14

a.m. Case-management conferences are every Thursday: criminal cases at 10:30 a.m. and civil

15

cases at 11:00 a.m. Parties must notice motions under the local rules and need not reserve a

16

hearing date in advance if the date is available on the court’s calendar (click “Calendars” at

17

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov). Depending on its schedule, the court may reset or vacate hearings.

18

Please call courtroom deputy Elaine Kabiling at [phone] with scheduling questions.

19

II. CHAMBERS COPIES

20

Under Civil Local Rule 5-1(b), parties must lodge a paper “Chambers” copy of any filing

21

unless another format makes more sense (such as for spreadsheets, pictures, or exhibits that are

22

better lodged electronically). Paper copies must be printed on both sides and three-hole punched,

23

and they must be the electronically filed copies with the PACER/ECF-generated header (with the

24

case number, docket number, date, and ECF page number). Exhibits must be tabbed. Parties do

25

not need to submit copies of certificates of service, certificates of interested entities or persons,

26

consents or declinations to the court’s jurisdiction, stipulations that do not require a court order

27

(see Civil Local Rule 6-1), or notices of appearance or substitution of counsel. Please read Civil

28

Local Rule 79-5 regarding the requirements for filing documents under seal and providing copies.
STANDING ORDER

1
2

III. CIVIL DISCOVERY
1. Evidence Preservation. After a party has notice of this order, it must take the steps needed

3

to preserve information relevant to the issues in this action, including suspending any document-

4

destruction programs (including destruction programs for electronically maintained material).

5

2. Production of Documents In Original Form. When searching for material under Federal

6

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) or after a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a) request, parties

7

(a) must search all locations — electronic and otherwise — where responsive materials might

8

plausibly exist, and (b) to the extent feasible, produce or make available for copying and/or

9

inspection the materials in their original form, sequence, and organization (including, for example,

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

file folders).
3. Privilege Logs. If a party withholds material as privileged, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) and

12

45(d)(2)(A), it must produce a privilege log that is sufficiently detailed for the opposing party to

13

assess whether the assertion of privilege is justified. The log must be produced as quickly as

14

possible but no later than fourteen days after the party’s disclosures or discovery responses are due

15

unless the parties stipulate to, or the court sets, another date. Unless the parties agree to a different

16

logging method, privilege logs must contain the following: (a) the title and description of the

17

document, the number of pages, and the Bates-number range; (b) the subject matter or general

18

nature of the document (without disclosing its contents); (c) the identity and position of its author;

19

(d) the date it was communicated (or prepared, if that is the more relevant date); (e) the identity

20

and position of all addressees and recipients of the communication; (f) the document’s present

21

location; (g) the specific basis for the assertion that the document is privileged or protected

22

(including a brief summary of any supporting facts); and (h) the steps taken to ensure the

23

confidentiality of the communication, including an affirmation that no unauthorized persons

24

received the communication.

25

4. Expedited Procedures for Discovery Disputes. The parties may not file formal discovery

26

motions. Instead, and as required by the federal rules and local rules, the parties must meet and

27

confer to try to resolve their disagreements. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1); Civil L. R. 37-1. Counsel

28

may confer initially by email, letter, or telephone to try to narrow their disputes. After trying those
STANDING ORDER

2

means, lead trial counsel then must meet and confer in person to try to resolve the dispute. (If

2

counsel are located outside of the Bay Area and cannot confer in person, lead counsel may meet

3

and confer by telephone.) Either party may demand such a meeting with ten days’ notice. If the

4

parties cannot agree on the location, the location for meetings will alternate. The plaintiff’s

5

counsel will select the first location, defense counsel will select the second location, and so forth.

6

If the parties do not resolve their disagreements through this procedure, lead counsel must file a

7

joint letter brief no later than five days after lead counsels’ in-person meet-and-confer. The letter

8

brief must be filed under the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions —

9

General > Discovery Letter Brief.” It may be no more than five pages (12-point font or greater,

10

margins of no less than one inch) without leave of the court. Lead counsel for both parties must

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

1

sign the letter and attest that they met and conferred in person. Each issue must be set forth in a

12

separate section that includes (1) a statement of the unresolved issue, (2) a summary of each

13

parties’ position (with citations to supporting facts and legal authority), and (3) each party’s final

14

proposed compromise. (This process allows a side-by-side, stand-alone analysis of each disputed

15

issue.) If the disagreement concerns specific discovery that a party has propounded, such as

16

interrogatories, requests for production of documents, or answers or objections to such discovery,

17

the parties must reproduce the question/request and the response in full either in the letter or, if the

18

page limits in the letter are not sufficient, in a single joint exhibit. The court then will review the

19

letter brief and determine whether formal briefing or future proceedings are necessary. In

20

emergencies during discovery events such as depositions, the parties may contact the court

21

through the court’s courtroom deputy pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-1(b) but first must send a

22

short joint email describing the nature of the dispute to [e-mail].

23

IV. CONSENT CASES

24

1. In cases that are assigned to Judge Beeler for all purposes, the parties must file their written

25

consent or declination of consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all

26

purposes as soon as possible. If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to dismiss or a

27

motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination simultaneously with the

28

motion, and the party opposing the motion must file the consent or declination simultaneously
STANDING ORDER

3

1

with the opposition.

2

2. The first joint case-management conference statement in a case must contain all of the

3

information in the Northern District’s standing order titled “Contents of Joint Case Management

4

Statement.” Subsequent statements for further case-management conferences must not repeat

5

information contained in an earlier statement and instead must report only progress or changes

6

since the last case-management conference and any new recommendations for case management.

7

V. SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTIONS

8

The parties may not file separate statements of undisputed facts. See Civil L. R. 56-2. Joint
statements of undisputed facts are not required but are helpful. Any joint statement must include

10

— for each undisputed fact — citations to admissible evidence. A joint statement generally must

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

9

be filed with the opening brief, and the briefs should cite to that statement. A reasonable process

12

for drafting a joint statement is as follows: (1) two weeks before the filing date, the moving party

13

proposes its undisputed facts, and (2) one week later, the responding party replies and the parties

14

meet and confer about any disagreements. For oppositions, a responding party may propose

15

additional undisputed facts to the moving party within seven days after the motion is filed and ask

16

for a response within two business days.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STANDING ORDER

4