Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Filing 116

Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc.

Doc. 116

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 116

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830 KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant GOOGLE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., Counter Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC., NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE INTERACTIVE SERVICES, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC. and EARTHLINK, INC., Counter Defendant/ Third-Party Defendants.

Case No. C 03-5340-JF DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Date: Time: Dept: Judge: June 23, 2006 9:00 a.m. 3 Honorable Jeremy Fogel November 26, 2003

Date Comp. Filed: Trial Date:

March 16, 2007

375316.01

DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 116

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Klaus H. Hamm, declare as follows: 1. I am associated with the firm of Keker & Van Nest LLP, counsel for Plaintiff

Google Inc., and am admitted to practice before this Court. Unless otherwise specified, the facts set forth herein are known to me of my personal knowledge, and if called upon I can testify truthfully thereto. Facts Pertaining to ABWF's Production of Documents and Responses to Google's Written Discovery 2. On information and belief, Google served ABWF with its first set of document

requests and first set of interrogatories on May 21, 2004. ABWF served its written responses to Google's first set of document requests and interrogatories on June 10, 2005. ABWF sent Google its first production of responsive documents, which fit into one banker's box, on or about October 26, 2005. 3. On March 16, Google sent ABWF a letter requesting that it respond more fully to

Google's first set of document requests. A true and correct copy of this letter, which is from Google's counsel Ajay Krishnan to ABWF's counsel David Rammelt, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. After two weeks passed without any response from ABWF, on March 28, 2006, Google sent another letter to ABWF. A true and correct copy of this letter, which is from Mr. Krishnan to Mr. Rammelt, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. ABWF finally responded to Google's letters on April 10, 2006. A true and correct copy of this letter, which is from ABWF attorney Caroline Plater to Mr. Krishnan, is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. On or about April 21, 2006, ABWF produced approximately 140 pages of

documents. Google sent ABWF a letter on May 12, 2006, requesting that ABWF further supplement its production. A true and correct copy of this letter, which is from Mr. Krishnan to Ms. Plater, is attached hereto as Exhibit D. On May 15, 2006, Google and ABWF exchanged emails regarding the date that ABWF would respond to Google's May 12, 2006 letter. A true and correct copy of this email correspondence, which is between Mr. Krishnan and Ms. Plater, is attached hereto as Exhibit E. On June 6, 2006, ABWF finally responded to Google's May 12, 2006 letter. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from Ms. Plater to myself and Mr. 1
DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF

375316.01

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 116

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Krishnan, is attached hereto as Exhibit F. 5. On June 15, 2006--the day that Google filed this opposition--Google received

two boxes of documents from ABWF. As a result, Google has not yet had the opportunity to review these documents. 6. On May 10, 2006, Google served ABWF with its second set of requests for

production, interrogatories, and requests for admission. Even though the deadline for a response was June 9, 2006, ABWF has provided Google with a response only to the second set of requests for admission. Facts Pertaining to Google's 30(b)(6) Deposition of ABWF 7. On February 15, 2006, Google served ABWF with a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition

notice, setting the deposition for March 15, 2006. A true and correct copy of that deposition notice is attached hereto as Exhibit G. Despite its repeated efforts to do so, Google has yet to take this deposition. 8. On February 22, 2006, ABWF sent Google a letter stating that its Rule 30(b)(6)

designee, Steve Katzman, was unavailable on March 15. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from Ms. Plater to myself, is attached hereto as Exhibit H. As a result, the parties agreed via email correspondence that the deposition would take place on April 20. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of that e-mail correspondence, which is between myself and Mr. Rammelt from March 1, 2006 to March 3, 2006. 9. As the April 20 Rule 30(b)(6) deposition date approached, it became clear that

ABWF would not produce documents in advance of the deposition so Google and ABWF agreed via email correspondence to reschedule the deposition again, for May 11, with the understanding that by that date ABWF would have completed its document production. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of that e-mail correspondence, which is between Mr. Krishnan and Ms. Plater from March 29, 2006 to March 30, 2006. 10. Then, just ten days before it was set to take place, ABWF sent Google an email

cancelling the May 11 Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and the parties then rescheduled the deposition yet again, for June 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of e-mail 2
DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF

375316.01

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 116

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

correspondence between Mr. Krishnan and Ms. Plater from May 1, 2006 to May 3, 2006 regarding ABWF's cancellation of the deposition and its subsequent re-scheduling. 11. On information and belief, on May 22, 2006, ABWF cancelled the June 6

deposition. On June 13, 2006, ABWF sent Google a letter stating that it would propose dates for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition by June 22, 2006. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from Ms. Plater to myself, is attached hereto as Exhibit L. Facts Pertaining to Google's Other Noticed Depositions 12. On May 19, 2006, Google sent ABWF a letter notifying ABWF of its intention to

depose four individuals listed in ABWF's initial disclosures. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from myself to Mr. Rammelt, is attached hereto as Exhibit M. 13. When ABWF did not respond to Google's May 19 letter, Google sent ABWF a

follow-up letter on June 1, 2006 regarding these depositions. That letter also included an individual deposition notice for a fifth person listed in ABWF's initial disclosures. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from myself to Mr. Rammelt, is attached hereto as Exhibit N. 14. ABWF sent a letter to Google on June 12, 2006 indicating its willingness to

proceed with one of the five depositions on June 22. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from Ms. Plater to myself, is attached hereto as Exhibit O. On June 13, 2006, ABWF sent Google a letter regarding the scheduling of the other four depositions. A true and correct copy of that letter, which is from Ms. Plater to myself, is attached hereto as Exhibit L. Facts Pertaining to Google's Responses to ABWF's Discovery Requests 15. On information and belief, Google has produced to ABWF approximately

137,000 pages to date. 16. On April 6, 2006, Google produced, on a CD that is readable on a standard CD-

ROM player, data bearing the Bates numbers GGLE00020950 - GGLE0021227. A true and correct copy of the accompanying cover letter, which is from me to Mr. Rammelt, is attached hereto as Exhibit P. 17. On April 18, 2006, Google and ABWF exchanged email in which Google

identified its Rule 30(b)(6) designees. A true and correct copy of that email correspondence, 3
DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF

375316.01

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF

Document 116

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

which is between myself and Mr. Rammelt is attached hereto as Exhibit Q. I state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements are true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 15, 2006.

/s/ Klaus H. Hamm KLAUS H. HAMM

4
375316.01

DECLARATION OF KLAUS H. HAMM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER, INC.'S [SIC] MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF