"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 262

Reply in support re Administrative 259 Motion To Set Briefing Schedule. filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kiernan, David) (Filed on 9/25/2009) Modified on 9/28/2009 ,(Document NOT linked to motion and Incorrect event used. Correct event to be used is reply in support.)(cv, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert A. Mittelstaedt #060359 Craig E. Stewart #129530 Michael Scott #255282 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. C 05-00037 JW C 06-04457 JW AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Having considered Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Set Briefing Schedule, the declaration of Robert Mittelsteadt, and Apple Inc.'s Reply in support thereof, and good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Set Briefing Schedule is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to defendant's Motion for Decertification of Rule 23(b)(3) Class by October 1, 2009. Plaintiffs shall make available any expert on whom plaintiffs rely in their opposition available for deposition no later than October 6, 2009. Apple shall file its reply by October 19, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________, 2009 James Ware United States District Court Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE'S ADM. MTN. TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE C 05 00037 JW, C 06-04457 JW

SFI-619671v1