"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 509

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal portions of Apples Opposition to Renewed Motion for Class Certification and the Expert Report of Dr. Michelle M. Burtis and the exhibits to the Declaration of David C. Kiernan in support thereof filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Scott, Michael) (Filed on 2/28/2011) Modified on 3/1/2011 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert A. Mittelstaedt #60359 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Craig E. Stewart #129530 cestewart@jonesday.com David C. Kiernan #215335 dkiernan@jonesday.com Michael T. Scott #255282 michaelscott@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION. Case No. C 05-00037 JW (HRL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Having considered Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Seal and the Declaration of Michael Scott in support of that motion, having determined that public disclosure of the confidential information described therein would harm defendant Apple Inc., and finding good reason to seal that information, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Apple Inc.'s Administrative Motion is GRANTED. Apple shall file under seal portions of Apple's Opposition to Renewed Motion for Class Certification and the Expert Report of Dr. Michelle M. Burtis in support thereof and the exhibits to the Declaration of David C. Kiernan in support thereof, in accordance with General Order 62. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ______________, 2011 James Ware United States District Judge -1[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Mot. to Seal C 05-00037 JW (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?