"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 513

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment, Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support Thereof and Exhibits 5-11, 14-18, 20-26, 28, 30-48, 50-52 And 54-57 Attached Thereto, and Declaration Of David Martin Pursuant To Local Rule 79-5(b)-(c). filed by Somtai Troy Charoensak, Mariana Rosen, Melanie Tucker. Motion Hearing set for 2/18/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration in Support Thereof, *** Declaration will be marked *Restricted* and will not be viewable by the public (or the filer). Per General Order 62. # 2 Proposed Order)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 2/28/2011) Modified on 3/1/2011 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation" Doc. 513 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-JW(HRL) CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF BONNY E. SWEENEY IN SUPPORT THEREOF AND EXHIBITS 5-11, 14-18, 20-26, 28, 3048, 50-52 AND 54-57 ATTACHED THERETO, AND DECLARATION OF DAVID MARTIN PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(b)-(c) 16 THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST LITIGATION 17 18 This Document Relates To: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALL ACTIONS. 610155_1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 This cause has come before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under 2 Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment 3 ("Opposition"), Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support Thereof ("Sweeney Declaration") and 4 Exhibits 5-11, 14-18, 20-26, 28, 30-48, 50-52 and 54-57 ("Sweeney Exhibits"), and Declaration of 5 David Martin ("Martin Declaration") Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(b)-(c). The Court, having 6 reviewed the submissions, ORDER, ADJUDGES and DECREES that: 7 Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Portions of the Opposition, Sweeney Declaration, 8 Sweeney Exhibits and Martin Declaration Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(b)-(c) is GRANTED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 DATED: _________________________ 11 12 Submitted by, 13 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 14 JOHN J. STOIA, JR. BONNY E. SWEENEY 15 THOMAS R. MERRICK ALEXANDRA S. BERNAY 16 CARMEN A. MEDICI 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 17 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 18 619/231-7423 (fax) 19 THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM ROY A. KATRIEL 20 1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20007 21 Telephone: 202/625-4342 202/330-5593 (fax) 22 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 23 24 25 26 27 28 610155_1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS' ADMIN MOTION TO FUS PORTIONS OF PLTFS' MEMO IN OPPO TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - C-05-00037-JW(HRL) -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C. 8 MICHAEL D. BRAUN 10680 West Pico Blvd., Suite 280 9 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Telephone: 310/836-6000 10 310/836-6010 (fax) 11 MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER LLP BRIAN P. MURRAY 12 JACQUELINE SAILER 275 Madison Avenue, Suite 801 13 New York, NY 10016 Telephone: 212/682-1818 14 212/682-1892 (fax) 15 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP MICHAEL GOLDBERG 16 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, CA 90067 17 Telephone: 310/201-9150 310/201-9160 (fax) 18 Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 610155_1 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN FRANCIS J. BALINT, JR. ELAINE A. RYAN TODD D. CARPENTER 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Telephone: 602/274-1100 602/274-1199 (fax) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS' ADMIN MOTION TO FUS PORTIONS OF PLTFS' MEMO IN OPPO TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - C-05-00037-JW(HRL) -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?