"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
Filing
602
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Scott, Michael) (Filed on 4/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Robert A. Mittelstaedt #60359
ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com
Craig E. Stewart #129530
cestewart@jonesday.com
David C. Kiernan #215335
dkiernan@jonesday.com
Michael T. Scott #255282
michaelscott@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 626-3939
Facsimile:
(415) 875-5700
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST
LITIGATION.
15
Case No. C 05-00037 JW (HRL)
C 06-04457 JW (HRL)
[CLASS ACTION]
16
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL
17
18
19
20
I.
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11(a) and 79-5(b) and (c), Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
21
requests that the Court permit Apple to file under seal Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Declaration
22
of David C. Kiernan in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude the
23
Opinions of Apple’s Expert, Dr. Michelle M. Burtis, Ph.D (“Supplemental Kiernan Declaration”),
24
which contains information that Apple designated “Confidential—Attorneys Eyes Only” under
25
the Stipulation and Protective Order Regarding Confidential Information (“Protective Order”)
26
entered June 13, 2007 (Dkt. 112).
27
Apple files this motion and the accompanying Declaration of Michael Scott (“Scott
28
Declaration”) in support of a narrowly tailored order authorizing sealing those documents, on the
___
Apple’s Administrative Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 JW (HRL); C 06-04457 JW (HRL)
1
grounds that there is good cause to protect the confidentiality of that information. The proposed
2
sealing order is based on the Protective Order and proof that particularized injury to Apple will
3
result if the sensitive information is publicly released.
4
II.
5
STANDARD
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), this Court has broad discretion to permit
6
sealing of court documents to protect “a trade secret or other confidential research, development,
7
or commercial information.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Based on this authority, the Ninth Circuit has
8
“carved out an exception to the presumption of access to judicial records for a sealed discovery
9
document [attached] to a non-dispositive motion.” Navarro v. Eskanos & Adler, No. C-06 02231
10
WHA (EDL), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24864, at *6 (N.D. Cal. March 22, 2007) (citing Kamakana
11
v. Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006)).
12
III.
ARGUMENT
13
A.
14
Pursuant to the Protective Order, Apple has designated as “Confidential-Attorneys Eyes
15
Only” certain information contained in Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Kiernan Declaration. As
16
established by the accompanying declarations, there is good cause to permit filing Exhibit 1 under
17
seal. Exhibit 1 contains highly confidential and commercially sensitive business information,
18
including information regarding Apple’s sales of iPods to iPod resellers, Apple’s iPod pricing
19
decisions, and iTunes Store sales and market share.
There Is Good Cause To Support Filing Under Seal.
20
Information regarding Apple’s pricing strategy and practices is highly confidential and
21
commercially sensitive business information. This information is non-public information that
22
should remain confidential. The information was produced to Plaintiffs pursuant to the Protective
23
Order. Harm to Apple would result from the public disclosure of the redacted information
24
contained in these documents. The public disclosure of information regarding Apple's pricing
25
strategy and practices would put Apple at a business disadvantage. See Scott Decl., Ex 1.
26
Identical information has been previously sealed in this case in relation to Apple’s Opposition to
27
Plaintiffs’ Motion To Exclude the Opinions of Defendant’s Expert, Dr. Michelle Mr. Burtis,
28
Ph.D. Dkt. 592.
-2-
Apple’s Administrative Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 JW (HRL); C 06-04457 JW (HRL)
1
Information regarding Apple’s sales of iPods to iPod resellers is also highly confidential
2
and commercially sensitive business information. This information is non-public information that
3
should remain confidential. See Scott Decl., Ex. 2. The information was produced to Plaintiffs
4
pursuant to the Protective Order. Harm to Apple would result from the public disclosure of the
5
redacted information contained in these documents. The public disclosure of information
6
regarding Apple’s sales of iPods to iPod resellers would put Apple at a business disadvantage.
7
Identical information has been previously sealed in this case in relation to Apple’s Opposition to
8
Plaintiffs’ Motion To Exclude the Opinions of Defendant’s Expert, Dr. Michelle Mr. Burtis,
9
Ph.D. Dkt. 592.
10
iTunes Store sales and market research conducted by Apple or on Apple’s behalf,
11
including information regarding iTunes market share, is highly confidential and commercially
12
sensitive business information. Third-party research is subject to confidentiality provisions in
13
contracts between Apple and the third-party market research providers. This information is non-
14
public information that should remain confidential. The information was produced to Plaintiffs
15
pursuant to the Protective Order. Harm to Apple would result from the public disclosure of such
16
information. See Scott Decl., Ex. 3. Identical information has been previously sealed in this case
17
in relation to Apple’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion To Exclude the Opinions of Defendant’s
18
Expert, Dr. Michelle Mr. Burtis, Ph.D. Dkt. 592.
19
20
IV.
CONCLUSION
Apple respectfully requests that this Court grant its Administrative Motion to Seal Exhibit
21
1 to the Supplemental Declaration of David C. Kiernan in Support of Apple’s Opposition to
22
Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Defendant’s Expert, Dr. Michelle M. Burtis, Ph.D.
23
24
Dated: April 15, 2011
25
Jones Day
By:
26
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
27
28
/s/ Michael T. Scott
Michael T. Scott
SFI-678166v1
-3-
Apple’s Administrative Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 JW (HRL); C 06-04457 JW (HRL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?