"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
Filing
645
REDACTION Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support of Plaintiffs' Response to the Court's June 22, 2011 Order Requiring Further Supplemental Briefing by Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 6/23/2011)
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2 JOHN J. STOIA, JR. (141757)
BONNY E. SWEENEY (176174)
3 THOMAS R. MERRICK (177987)
ALEXANDRA S. BERNAY (211068)
4 CARMEN A. MEDICI (248417)
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
5 San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
6 619/231-7423 (fax)
johns@rgrdlaw.com
7 bonnys@rgrdlaw.com
tmerrick@rgrdlaw.com
8 xanb@rgrdlaw.com
cmedici@rgrdlaw.com
9
THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM
10 ROY A. KATRIEL (pro hac vice)
1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 500
11 Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: 202/625-4342
12 202/330-5593 (fax)
rak@katriellaw.com
13
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
14
[Additional counsel appear on signature page.]
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-JW(HRL)
19 LITIGATION
)
) CLASS ACTION
20
)
) DECLARATION OF BONNY E. SWEENEY
This Document Relates To:
21
) IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE
) TO THE COURT’S JUNE 22, 2011 ORDER
ALL ACTIONS.
22
) REQUIRING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
23
JUDGE: Chief Judge James Ware
24
DATE:
June 27, 2011
TIME:
9:00 a.m.
25
CTRM: 5 – 17th Floor
26
REDACTED VERSION
27
28
633423_1
1
I, BONNY E. SWEENEY, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all of the courts of the State of
3 California. I am a member with the law of firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Co-Lead
4 Class Counsel of record for Plaintiffs Melanie Tucker, Mariana Rosen, and Somtai Troy Charoensak
5 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in this action. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein,
6 and, if called upon, I could and would competently testify thereto.
7
2.
I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Response to the Court’s June 22,
8 2011 Order Requiring Further Supplemental Briefing.
9
3.
Attached are true and correct copies of the following exhibits:
10
Exhibit A:
Proposed Class Definition;
11
Exhibit B:
Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Mark Donnelly, taken
12
13
December 20, 2010 [filed under seal];
Exhibit C:
14
15
16
17
Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Michelle M. Burtis,
Ph.D. taken March 14, 2011 [filed under seal]; and
Exhibit D:
Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Roger G. Noll, taken
April 7, 2011 [filed under seal].
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
18 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23rd day of June, 2011, at San Diego, California.
19
20
s/ Bonny E. Sweeney
BONNY E. SWEENEY
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
633423_1
DECLARATION OF BONNY E. SWEENEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
JUNE 22, 2011 ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING - C-05-00037-JW(HRL)
-1-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 23, 2011, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing with
3 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the
4 e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I
5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List.
7
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 23, 2011.
9
s/ Bonny E. Sweeney
BONNY E. SWEENEY
10
13
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101-3301
Telephone: 619/231-1058
619/231-7423 (fax)
14
E-mail:
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
633423_1
bonnys@rgrdlaw.com
CAND-ECF-
Page 1 of 2
Mailing Information for a Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW
Electronic Mail Notice List
The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case.
Francis Joseph Balint , Jr
fbalint@bffb.com
Alexandra Senya Bernay
xanb@rgrdlaw.com
Michael D Braun
service@braunlawgroup.com
Michael D. Braun
service@braunlawgroup.com,clc@braunlawgroup.com
Todd David Carpenter
tcarpenter@bffb.com,pjohnson@bffb.com,rcreech@bffb.com
Andrew S. Friedman
khonecker@bffb.com,rcreech@bffb.com,afriedman@bffb.com
Alreen Haeggquist
alreenh@zhlaw.com,judyj@zhlaw.com,winkyc@zhlaw.com
Roy Arie Katriel
rak@katriellaw.com,rk618@aol.com
Thomas J. Kennedy
tkennedy@murrayfrank.com
David Craig Kiernan
dkiernan@jonesday.com,lwong@jonesday.com
Carmen Anthony Medici
cmedici@rgrdlaw.com,slandry@rgrdlaw.com
Thomas Robert Merrick
tmerrick@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com
Caroline Nason Mitchell
cnmitchell@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com,ewallace@jonesday.com
Robert Allan Mittelstaedt
ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com
Brian P Murray
bmurray@murrayfrank.com
George A. Riley
griley@omm.com,lperez@omm.com,cchiu@omm.com
Elaine A. Ryan
https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?462386862203771-L_366_0-1
6/23/2011
CAND-ECF-
Page 2 of 2
eryan@bffb.com,nserden@bffb.com
Jacqueline Sailer
jsailer@murrayfrank.com
Michael Tedder Scott
michaelscott@jonesday.com,amhoward@jonesday.com
Craig Ellsworth Stewart
cestewart@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com
John J. Stoia , Jr
jstoia@rgrdlaw.com
Bonny E. Sweeney
bonnys@rgrdlaw.com,christinas@rgrdlaw.com,E_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com
Helen I. Zeldes
helenz@zhlaw.com
Manual Notice List
The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require
manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to
create notices or labels for these recipients.
(No manual recipients)
https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?462386862203771-L_366_0-1
6/23/2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?