"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 645

REDACTION Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support of Plaintiffs' Response to the Court's June 22, 2011 Order Requiring Further Supplemental Briefing by Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 JOHN J. STOIA, JR. (141757) BONNY E. SWEENEY (176174) 3 THOMAS R. MERRICK (177987) ALEXANDRA S. BERNAY (211068) 4 CARMEN A. MEDICI (248417) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 5 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 6 619/231-7423 (fax) johns@rgrdlaw.com 7 bonnys@rgrdlaw.com tmerrick@rgrdlaw.com 8 xanb@rgrdlaw.com cmedici@rgrdlaw.com 9 THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM 10 ROY A. KATRIEL (pro hac vice) 1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 500 11 Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: 202/625-4342 12 202/330-5593 (fax) rak@katriellaw.com 13 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 14 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTI-TRUST ) Lead Case No. C-05-00037-JW(HRL) 19 LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION 20 ) ) DECLARATION OF BONNY E. SWEENEY This Document Relates To: 21 ) IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE ) TO THE COURT’S JUNE 22, 2011 ORDER ALL ACTIONS. 22 ) REQUIRING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 23 JUDGE: Chief Judge James Ware 24 DATE: June 27, 2011 TIME: 9:00 a.m. 25 CTRM: 5 – 17th Floor 26 REDACTED VERSION 27 28 633423_1 1 I, BONNY E. SWEENEY, declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all of the courts of the State of 3 California. I am a member with the law of firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Co-Lead 4 Class Counsel of record for Plaintiffs Melanie Tucker, Mariana Rosen, and Somtai Troy Charoensak 5 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in this action. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein, 6 and, if called upon, I could and would competently testify thereto. 7 2. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Response to the Court’s June 22, 8 2011 Order Requiring Further Supplemental Briefing. 9 3. Attached are true and correct copies of the following exhibits: 10 Exhibit A: Proposed Class Definition; 11 Exhibit B: Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Mark Donnelly, taken 12 13 December 20, 2010 [filed under seal]; Exhibit C: 14 15 16 17 Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Michelle M. Burtis, Ph.D. taken March 14, 2011 [filed under seal]; and Exhibit D: Relevant excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Roger G. Noll, taken April 7, 2011 [filed under seal]. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 18 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23rd day of June, 2011, at San Diego, California. 19 20 s/ Bonny E. Sweeney BONNY E. SWEENEY 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 633423_1 DECLARATION OF BONNY E. SWEENEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S JUNE 22, 2011 ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING - C-05-00037-JW(HRL) -1- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 23, 2011, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing with 3 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 4 e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 7 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 23, 2011. 9 s/ Bonny E. Sweeney BONNY E. SWEENEY 10 13 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101-3301 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 14 E-mail: 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 633423_1 bonnys@rgrdlaw.com CAND-ECF- Page 1 of 2 Mailing Information for a Case 5:05-cv-00037-JW Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. Francis Joseph Balint , Jr fbalint@bffb.com Alexandra Senya Bernay xanb@rgrdlaw.com Michael D Braun service@braunlawgroup.com Michael D. Braun service@braunlawgroup.com,clc@braunlawgroup.com Todd David Carpenter tcarpenter@bffb.com,pjohnson@bffb.com,rcreech@bffb.com Andrew S. Friedman khonecker@bffb.com,rcreech@bffb.com,afriedman@bffb.com Alreen Haeggquist alreenh@zhlaw.com,judyj@zhlaw.com,winkyc@zhlaw.com Roy Arie Katriel rak@katriellaw.com,rk618@aol.com Thomas J. Kennedy tkennedy@murrayfrank.com David Craig Kiernan dkiernan@jonesday.com,lwong@jonesday.com Carmen Anthony Medici cmedici@rgrdlaw.com,slandry@rgrdlaw.com Thomas Robert Merrick tmerrick@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Caroline Nason Mitchell cnmitchell@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com,ewallace@jonesday.com Robert Allan Mittelstaedt ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com Brian P Murray bmurray@murrayfrank.com George A. Riley griley@omm.com,lperez@omm.com,cchiu@omm.com Elaine A. Ryan https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?462386862203771-L_366_0-1 6/23/2011 CAND-ECF- Page 2 of 2 eryan@bffb.com,nserden@bffb.com Jacqueline Sailer jsailer@murrayfrank.com Michael Tedder Scott michaelscott@jonesday.com,amhoward@jonesday.com Craig Ellsworth Stewart cestewart@jonesday.com,mlandsborough@jonesday.com John J. Stoia , Jr jstoia@rgrdlaw.com Bonny E. Sweeney bonnys@rgrdlaw.com,christinas@rgrdlaw.com,E_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com Helen I. Zeldes helenz@zhlaw.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. (No manual recipients) https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?462386862203771-L_366_0-1 6/23/2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?