"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 751

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll; Plaintiffs' Responsive Separate Statement in Support of Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll and Exhibits 1-4, 9-17, 20-29, 31-46, 48-54, 56, and 58-62 Under Seal Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5(c) filed by Somtai Troy Charoensak, Mariana Rosen, Melanie Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration in support thereof, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Seal, # 3 Unredacted Version of Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll, # 4 Exhibit 1-2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5-8, # 8 Exhibit 9-17, # 9 Exhibit 18-19, # 10 Exhibit 20-29, # 11 Exhibit 30, # 12 Exhibit 31-35, # 13 Exhibit 36-46, # 14 Exhibit 47, # 15 Exhibit 48-54, # 16 Exhibit 55, # 17 Exhibit 56, # 18 Exhibit 57, # 19 Exhibit 58-62, # 20 Declaration of Bonny E. Sweeney in Support of Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll, # 21 Unredacted Version of Plaintiffs' Responsive Separate Statement in Support of Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll, # 22 Proposed Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony of Roger G. Noll)(Sweeney, Bonny) (Filed on 1/13/2014)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7 ( 111 I, Amanda Marks, declare as follows: 2 1. I am Executive Vice President and General Manager of Universal Music 3 Distribution and was formerly Senior Vice President, Universal Music Group - eLabs. I have 4 personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and would and could testify competently thereto if 5 called as a witness in this matter. 6 7 2. UMG Recordings, Inc. is a record company which is part of what is known as the Universal Music Group ("Universal"). Universal is one of the world's leading music companies. 8 Universal discovers, develops, markets and distributes recorded music in a number of ways, 9 including through licenses or distribution agreements with various companies. 3. 10 Universal, like other music companies, entered into agreements with Apple, Inc. 11 ("Apple") for the sale of Universal's sound recordings through Apple's iTunes Store. These 12 agreements set forth the terms and conditions under which Apple provided certain services, 13 including the sale of downloads of sound recordings. Universal and Apple updated the 14 agreements from time to time to make changes to the terms and conditions. 15 4. As part of the agreements, Universal required that its sound recordings available for 16 sale by Apple through the iTunes Store have content protection to guard against piracy. In or 17 around 2004 Universal had discussions with Apple, in which Universal expressed to Apple that 18 while Universal continued to require content protection, Universal wanted interoperability 19 between its music sold through online stores and portable digital music players. Universal has 20 always had an interest in having its music sold in the widest manner possible, through as many 21 channels as possible. 22 III 23 III 24 III 25 26 27 28 1 5. During the relevant period, Universal 2 IIcompanies, including 3 IIUniversal's music was sold through such companies' 4 II 5 RealNetworks, entered into agreements which set forth the terms and conditions 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 under which online stores. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the II foregoing is true and correct. Executed December d2 2010, at Los Angeles, 6 7 with other ~/?2~ AMANDA MARKS California. EXHIBIT 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?