"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"
Filing
756
RESPONSE (re 750 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, dated December 20, 2013 ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amir Q. Amiri in Support of Apple's Response, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Admin. Motion to Seal, # 3 Apple's (Proposed) Redactions to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Suppl. Report of K. Murphy and R. Topel)(Amiri, Amir) (Filed on 1/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359)
ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com
Craig E. Stewart (State Bar No. 129530)
cestewart@jonesday.com
David C. Kiernan (State Bar No. 215335)
dkiernan@jonesday.com
Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
aamiri@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 626-3939
Facsimile:
(415) 875-5700
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
15
THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST
LITIGATION.
16
Case No. C 05-00037-YGR
[CLASS ACTION]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL
17
18
19
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
20
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Supplemental Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel,
21
Dated December 20, 2013 (ECF No. 750).
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5, Apple Inc. has filed a response to Plaintiffs’ Administrative
23
Motion. In its response, Apple seeks to seal only certain portions of Plaintiffs’ motion that
24
contain confidential information, the public disclosure of which would harm Apple.
25
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion and Apple’s response thereto, and
26
having determined that public disclosure of the confidential information described in Plaintiffs’
27
motion would harm Apple, and finding compelling reasons and good cause to seal that
28
information, see Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-80 (9th Cir.
___
[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR
1
2006), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion is GRANTED as
2
follows:
3
ECF
4
Filed Under Seal/Redacted
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Supplemental
Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H.
Topel, Dated December 20, 2013 (ECF No. 7503).
• fn. 2; lines 3-4.
Redacted
No.
5
6
750-3
7
8
Title
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: ______________, 2014
11
By:
12
13
The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge
14
15
SFI-849445v1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?