"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

Filing 756

RESPONSE (re 750 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, dated December 20, 2013 ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amir Q. Amiri in Support of Apple's Response, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Admin. Motion to Seal, # 3 Apple's (Proposed) Redactions to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Suppl. Report of K. Murphy and R. Topel)(Amiri, Amir) (Filed on 1/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359)
[e-mail]
Craig E. Stewart (State Bar No. 129530)
[e-mail]
David C. Kiernan (State Bar No. 215335)
[e-mail]
Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15

THE APPLE iPOD iTUNES ANTI-TRUST
LITIGATION.

16

Case No. C 05-00037-YGR
[CLASS ACTION]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL

17
18
19

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal

20

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Supplemental Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel,

21

Dated December 20, 2013 (ECF No. 750).

22

Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5, Apple Inc. has filed a response to Plaintiffs’ Administrative

23

Motion. In its response, Apple seeks to seal only certain portions of Plaintiffs’ motion that

24

contain confidential information, the public disclosure of which would harm Apple.

25

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion and Apple’s response thereto, and

26

having determined that public disclosure of the confidential information described in Plaintiffs’

27

motion would harm Apple, and finding compelling reasons and good cause to seal that

28

information, see Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-80 (9th Cir.
___
[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR

1

2006), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion is GRANTED as

2

follows:

3

ECF

4

Filed Under Seal/Redacted

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Supplemental
Report of Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H.
Topel, Dated December 20, 2013 (ECF No. 7503).
• fn. 2; lines 3-4.

Redacted

No.

5
6

750-3

7
8

Title

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: ______________, 2014

11

By:

12
13

The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Judge

14
15

SFI-849445v1

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[Proposed] Order Granting Admin. Motion to Seal
C 05-00037 YGR