Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Filing 85

Attachment 1
MOTION Extension to Submit Declarations and Protective Order re 83 Order, 84 Motion Hearing, Re Rule 11 Motion of Google filed by Kinderstart.Com, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Stipulation & Protective Order)(Yu, Gregory) (Filed on 2/1/2007)

Download PDF
Kinderstart.Com, LLC v. Google, Inc. Doc. 85 Att. 1 Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 85-2 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregory J. Yu (State Bar No. 133955) GLOBAL LAW GROUP 2015 Pioneer Court, Suite P-1 San Mateo, CA 94403 Telephone: (650) 570-4140 Facsimile: (650) 570-4142 E-mail: glgroup [at] inreach [dot] com Attorney for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class and Subclasses UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION KINDERSTART.COM LLC, a California Case No. C 06-2057 JF limited liability company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DECLARATIONS Plaintiffs, SUBMITTED IN CAMERA PER JANUARY 22, 2007 COURT ORDER v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Subject to approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to the following: 1. On October 20, 2006, Defendant Google, Inc. ("Google") filed a motion for sanctions against Plaintiff KinderStart.com LLC ("KinderStart") and its legal counsel Gregory J. Yu for sanctions under Rule 11 ("Rule 11 Motion") of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On January 22, 2007, the Court issued an order (the "Rule 11 Order") that Gregory J. Yu submit to the Court in camera declarations ("Rule 11 Declarations") to support certain allegations in the Second Amended Complaint by February 6, 2007. The parties agree, subject to Court approval, that the original deadline of February 6, 2007 be extended by 14 calendar days to February 20, 2007 for submitting Rule 11 Declarations pursuant to the Rule 11 Order. KinderStart's legal counsel has communicated to Google's legal counsel that one of the Rule 11 declarants is out of the United States until February 8, 2007. Accordingly, Google is willing to stipulate to an STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DECLARATIONS PURSUANT TO GOOGLE'S RULE 11 MOTION -1- Case No. C 06-2057 JF Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 85-2 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 extension for KinderStart to submit all Rule 11 declarations to the Court by February 20, 2007. 2. KinderStart does not believe that the in camera submission of declarations pursuant to the Rule 11 Order necessarily contemplates that Google's legal counsel is entitled to receive and view copies of the same. Nonetheless, KinderStart agrees that Google's outside legal counsel should be permitted to view the Rule 11 Declarations pursuant to this Stipulated Order to enable it to further prosecute the Rule 11 Motion on behalf of Google. 3. On the same day that KinderStart submits to the Court in camera the Rule 11 Declarations as required by the deadline in the Rule 11 Order, subject to any extension ordered herein, KinderStart and its legal counsel will deliver a single copy of all such declarations to the offices of Google's outside legal counsel bearing the designation "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." The designation "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" shall mean Google's current attorneys of record at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati and shall not include any other legal counsel now or later associated with such counsel. Such counsel to Google includes the paralegal, clerical and secretarial staff employed by counsel. Such designation herein shall mean that no other person or entity, including expert witnesses or outside consultants, may have access to such material or view any portion thereof, unless so ordered by the Court upon a showing of good cause. 4. Nothing herein shall be deemed to: (a) constitute, govern or affect any subsequent protective order between the parties in this action as to other materials, (b) alter the confidentiality or nonconfidentiality of any disclosed material, or (c) alter any existing obligations or the absence thereof of either party or any declarant. 5. This order shall survive the final termination of this action. When the parties' respective counsel agree that the Rule 11 Motion and KinderStart's Rule 11 cross-motion have concluded, outside counsel for Google will assemble and return all disclosed Rule 11 Declarations and all copies of the same to Plaintiffs' legal counsel, or shall certify destruction of the same. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this stipulation and order. \\\ \\\ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DECLARATIONS PURSUANT TO GOOGLE'S RULE 11 MOTION -2- Case No. C 06-2057 JF Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 85-2 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 1, 2007 GLOBAL LAW GROUP By: ____________/s/_________________ Gregory J. Yu, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff KinderStart.com LLC and for the proposed Class and Subclasses Dated: February 1, 2007 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI By: ____________/s/_________________ Bart E. Volkmer, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. ECF CERTIFICATION I, Gregory J. Yu, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation & Proposed Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Bart E. Volkmer has concurred in this filing. Dated: February 1, 2007 GLOBAL LAW GROUP By: ___________ /s/_________________ Gregory J. Yu, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff KinderStart.com LLC and for the proposed Class and Subclasses [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DECLARATIONS PURSUANT TO GOOGLE'S RULE 11 MOTION -3- Case No. C 06-2057 JF Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 85-2 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT SO ORDERED. Plaintiff KinderStart.com LLC shall have until February 20, 2007 to submit Rule 11 Declarations pursuant to this Court's Order of January 22, 2007. Plaintiff shall provide copies of such declarations to counsel for Google on a "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" basis. Dated: _________________, 2007 _____________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DECLARATIONS PURSUANT TO GOOGLE'S RULE 11 MOTION -4- Case No. C 06-2057 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?