Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Filing 83

Declaration of David Olson in Support of 82 Reply to Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs filed byCarol Loeb Shloss. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G# 8 Exhibit H# 9 Exhibit I)(Related document(s) 82 ) (Olson, David) (Filed on 5/21/2007)

Shloss v. Sweeney et al

Doc. 83 Att. 6

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 1 of 7

EXHIBIT F

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 2 of 7

David Olson 04/25/2007 03:44 PM

To: "Maria K. Nelson" <[e-mail]> cc: Amanda Smith <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], [e-mail] Subject: Re: Hearing date for fees motion

Hi Maria, I got your voice mail regarding filing a stip to move the hearing date to June 4th. I assumed that you would draft the stip since we are moving the date to accommodate your schedule, but if you are too busy and would like me to draft it I would be happy to do so. Best, David "Maria K. Nelson" <[e-mail]>
"Maria K. Nelson" <mknelson@JonesDay .com> 04/19/2007 12:15 PM To: David Olson <[e-mail]> cc: Amanda Smith <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], [e-mail] Subject: Re: Hearing date for fees motion

David, That works for me. Note, however, that by agreeing to the hearing date we do not waive any argument that the motion was improperly filed. Best, Maria Maria K. Nelson Jones Day 555 South Flower Street Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [phone] (direct dial) [phone] (facsimile) [phone] (firm) [e-mail]

David Olson <[e-mail] ord.edu> 04/17/2007 02:52 PM

"Maria K. Nelson" <[e-mail]>

To

cc [e-mail], [e-mail], Amanda Smith <[e-mail]> Subject Re: Hearing date for fees motion

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 3 of 7

Maria, Let's go with your initial proposal and set the hearing for June 4th, and you can have all of the extra time. As I mentioned in my previous email, anything after June 5 does not work on our end. Best, David "Maria K. Nelson" <[e-mail]> 04/17/2007 02:23 PM

To: David Olson <[e-mail]> cc: "falzone" <[e-mail]> Subject: Re: Hearing date for fees motion

David -May 28 is Memorial Day, so I doubt that the Court will want to have a hearing that day. I was looking at June 11 or after, as trial is scheduled to start May 14 and will likely go two weeks. Although a June 4 hearing date may be do-able, giving you an extra week for a reply is not because that would mean having the brief due the day trial starts. So, as a compromise, I propose just moving the date to June 11 without any exceptions under the local rule schedule. Maria Maria K. Nelson Jones Day 555 South Flower Street Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [phone] (direct dial) [phone] (facsimile) [phone] (firm) [e-mail]

David Olson <[e-mail] ord.edu>

"Maria K. Nelson"

To

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 4 of 7

04/16/2007 11:41 AM

<[e-mail]>

cc "falzone" <[e-mail]> Subject Re: Hearing date for fees motion

Maria, Either May 28 or June 4 works on our end. Anything after June 4 does not work because Tony will be out for three weeks starting June 5. If we go with the later June 4 date, we would like to have one of the extra weeks as extra time on our reply brief. Thanks, David

"Maria K. Nelson" <[e-mail]> 04/12/2007 12:27 PM

To: "David Olson" <[e-mail]> cc: "falzone" <[e-mail]> Subject: Re: Activity in Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Shloss v. Sweeney et al "Motion for Attorney Fees"

David -- yes I have seen the motion. The hearing date and briefing schedule are not convenient as I currently am scheduled to be in trial in Texas then. I am not in the office but will be back tomorrow. A two week postponement should work for me, subject to the court schedule. Can you check on your end to see if that works and we can firm up tomorrow? Thanks. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 5 of 7

----- Original Message ----From: David Olson [[e-mail]] Sent: 04/10/2007 11:20 PM MST To: Maria Nelson Cc: [e-mail] Subject: Activity in Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Shloss v. Sweeney et al "Motion for Attorney Fees"

Dear Maria, As you've probably seen by now, we filed a motion for fees today. Please feel free to give me a call or email if you need to discuss the hearing date or briefing schedule. Regards, David S. Olson [e-mail] Resident Fellow STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CENTER FOR INTERNET AND SOCIETY 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA 94305-8610 tel: [phone] · fax: [phone] · mobile: [phone] ----- Forwarded by David Olson/Staff/stanford on 04/10/2007 11:18 PM [e-mail] urts.gov 04/10/2007 08:41 PM To: [e-mail] cc: Subject: Activity in Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Shloss v. Sweeney et al "Motion for Attorney Fees"

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Northern District of California Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text. Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 6 of 7

document or not. If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document. If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .. See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information. The following transaction was received from Olson, David S. entered on 4/10/2007 at 8:41 PM and filed on 4/10/2007 Case Name: Case Number: Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 03/28/2007 Document Number: 73 Shloss v. Sweeney et al 5:06-cv-3718 Carol Loeb Shloss

Docket Text: MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Carol Loeb Shloss. Motion Hearing set for 5/21/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Olson, David) (Filed on 4/10/2007) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document description:Main Document Original filename:Z:\Cases\Shloss v. Estate of Joyce\District Court Pleadings\Atty Fee Motion\Attorneys Fee Motion 4-7-10.pdf Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP CANDStamp_ID=977336130 [Date=4/10/2007] [FileNumber=3362076-0] [336cd319702b3adc69e85a40c94430871508c8ed477ea099badeb5cdc6e1d0f46171c 9a13258ae9816448bfecd745ffda3b95ab884f9168e904e2be82e48dcfb]]

5:06-cv-3718 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Bernard A. Burk [e-mail], [e-mail]; [e-mail] Anthony T. Falzone [e-mail], [e-mail] Jennifer Stisa Granick Mark A. Lemley [e-mail],

[e-mail], [e-mail]

Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW

Document 83-7

Filed 05/21/2007

Page 7 of 7

Dorothy Rebecca McLaughlin Maria K. Nelson David S. Olson

[e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], efili! [e-mail]; mls@kvn..com;

Matthew Mickle Werdegar [e-mail]

5:06-cv-3718 Notice will be delivered by other means to: Lawrence Lessig Center for Internet & Society Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbot Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610

========== This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected. ==========

========== This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected. ========== !SIG:4627bfb0219835840114993!