IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.

Filing 84

Declaration of Gill Sperlein in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 83 filed by IO Group, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Papa Deposition Excerpts# 2 Exhibit Styn Deposition Excerpts)(Related document(s) 83 ) (Sperlein, Dennis) (Filed on 8/14/2007) Text modified on 8/15/2007 to conform to document caption post by counsel (bw, COURT STAFF).

IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.

Doc. 84

Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL

Document 84

Filed 08/14/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GILL SPERLEIN (172887) THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN 584 Castro Street, Suite 849 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: [phone] X32 Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. VEOH NETWORKS, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C-06-03926 (HRL) DECLARATION OF GILL SPERLEIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE: September 4, 2007 TIME: 10:00 a.m. COURTROOM: 2

I, GILL SPERLEIN, declare: 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California and attorney of

record for Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the relevant excerpted

pages of the deposition transcript of Defendant Veoh Network's Director of Product Development, Joseph Papa, who testified on behalf of Defendant Veoh Networks, Inc. under F.R.C.P. 30(b)(6). The excerpted deposition pages accurately reflect the questions asked and the answers given
-1SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C-06-3926 (HRL)

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL

Document 84

Filed 08/14/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

during depositions which I took on May 21 and 22, 2007, in San Diego, California. Defendant's deposition was reported by Nicole R. Harnish, RPR, CSR No. 13101. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the relevant excerpted

pages of the deposition transcript of Mr. John Styn ("Styn") a paid consultant of Defendant Veoh Network. The excerpted deposition pages accurately reflect the questions asked and the answers given during the Styn deposition which I took on May 31, in San Diego, California. Mr. Styn's deposition was reported by Regina L. Garrison, RPR, CSR No. 12921. 4. Judgment. These pages supplement excerpted pages filed with Plaintiff's Motion for Summary

Pursuant to the laws of the United States, I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: August 14, 2007

/s/ Gill Sperlein ____________________ GILL SPERLEIN, Attorney for Plaintiff

-2SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C-06-3926 (HRL)