The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 233

Plaintiffs' Civil Local Rule 7-11 Miscellaneous Administrative Request for Order Setting Case Management Conference or Issuing Case Management order file d by Mark Zuckerberg, The Facebook, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Theresa Sutton, # 2 (Proposed) Order Sutton, Theresa) (Filed on 12/11/2007) Text modified, incorrect event type used on 12/12/2007 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G. HOPKINS GUY, III (State Bar No. 124811) hopguy@orrick.co m I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746) mcooper@orrick.co m THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857) tsutton@orrick.com YVONNE P. GREER (State Bar No. 214072) ygreer@orrick.co m ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FACEBOOK, INC., and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaint iffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, WAYNE CHANG, and DAVID GUCWA AND DOES 1-25, Defendants. CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS PLAINTIFFS' CIVIL L.R. 7-11 MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OR ISSUING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OHS West:260348171.2 ADMIN REQUEST FOR CMC OR CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg hereby request that the Court set a Case Management Conference or sua sponte issue a Case Management Order as soon as possible. A [Proposed] Order is attached. Also attached is a Declaration of Theresa A. Sutton describing Plaintiffs' efforts to meet and confer concerning this Request. This Court held the init ial Case Management Conference on July 11, 2007. Dkt. No. 113. At that hearing, the Court indicated that, after the motions to dismiss were settled, it expected the case to move with some "dispatch" as it has been lingering for quite some time. 7/11/07 Hr'g Tr. 83:17-84:4. In addition, the Court indicated that it would, after deciding the then-pending Motion to Dismiss by Williams and PNS, set a dates in this matter. Id. 93:8-19. The Court reiterated this sentiment during the hearing held October 10, 2007 on Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions and Cameron Winklevoss', Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra's Motion to Dismiss. In the Joint Case Management Statement, Defendants proposed that "once the Court rules on the last motion to dismiss, it hold a supplemental case management conference ...". Dkt. No. 98 at 8 & 13, fn. 4. No further case management conference has been scheduled nor has a case management schedule been ordered. Now that all of the motions to dismiss, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 124 and 232, have been resolved, a further case management conference or case management order is appropriate in this action, identifying a trial date and a date for discovery cut-off. Discovery has been ongoing in this case since long before the July 11, 2007, hearing, and therefore Plaintiffs request that a 2008 trial date be set. Plaint iffs respectfully request, therefore, that the Court either set a further case management conference at its earliest convenience or issue a case management order setting discovery, ADR, and trial dates. Dated: December 11, 2007 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP /s/ Theresa A. Sutton /s/ Theresa A. Sutton Attorneys for Plaintiffs FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG OHS West:260348171.2 -2- ADMIN REQUEST FOR CMC OR CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?