The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 470

Memorandum in Opposition re 467 MOTION to Intervene and MOTION to Unseal Document and Hearing Transcript filed byMark Zuckerberg, The Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part)(Sutton, Theresa) (Filed on 6/30/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SEAN A. LINCOLN (State Bar No. 136387) [e-mail] I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985) [e-mail] MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746) [e-mail] THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857) [e-mail] YVONNE P. GREER (State Bar No. 214072) [e-mail] ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, , Defendants. Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CNET'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND TO UNSEAL HEARING TRANSCRIPT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO INTERVENE AND TO UNSEAL CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The matter before the Court is Intervenor CNET Networks, Inc.'s ("CNET") Motion for Leave to Intervene and To Unseal Hearing Transcript and Other Documents. The Court has considered said motion and all papers in support and opposition thereto and, finding good cause, hereby grants CNET's motion in part and denies the motion in part as follows: · CNET's Motion to Intervene in this action for the limited purpose of addressing its Motion to Intervene and to Unseal the June 23, 2008 hearing transcript is GRANTED; · CNET's Motion to Unseal a redacted version of the June 23, 2008 hearing transcript regarding Facebook's Confidential Motion is GRANTED. The parties shall provide to the Court by July 9, 2008, a joint-proposed, redacted form of the June 23, 2008 hearing transcript with declarations supporting the reasons the proposed redacted information should remain sealed; · CNET's Motion to Unseal documents previously sealed by this Court, the Court in Massachusetts, and the Superior Court is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _________ ___, 2008

Honorable James Ware United States District Judge Northern District of California

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO INTERVENE AND TO UNSEAL CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01389-JW