The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 578

MOTION to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending 582 Appeal filed by ConnectU LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/27/2008 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Parke, Evan) (Filed on 7/31/2008) Modified on 8/1/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (CA BAR NO. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 D. MICHAEL UNDERHILL (pro hac vice) munderhill@bsfllp.com BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Attorneys for Defendant CONNECTU, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, Defendants. Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY 5:07-CV-01389-JW 1 The Court, having considered Defendant ConnectU, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Execution of 2 Judgment Pending Appeal and documents attached thereto, and the records on file in this action, 3 hereby ORDERS that Defendant ConnectU, Inc.'s motion to stay is GRANTED and that the 4 actions required of the parties by the Judgment are stayed during the pendency of any and all 5 appeals taken from the Judgment and related orders entered in this case. 6 7 Dated: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY 5:07-CV-01389-JW , 2008 Honorable James Ware United States District Judge Northern District of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?