The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 619

USCA Case Number 08-16849 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 615 Notice of Cross Appeal, filed by Mark Zuckerberg, The Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 USCA time schedule order)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2008)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE NINTH CIRCUIT

F IL E D
AUG 20 2008
M O L L Y C . D W YE R , C LE R K O F C O U R T U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

T H E FACEBOOK, INC.; MARK ZU CK ERBERG , Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. C O N N E C T U , INC., FKA ConnectU, L L C ; PACIFIC NORTHWEST S O F T W A R E , INC.; WAYNE CHANG; W I N S T O N WILLIAMS; CAMERON W IN K L E V O S S ; TYLER WINKLEVOSS; D IV Y A NARENDRA, Defendants - Appellees.

N o . 08-16849 / 08-16745 D .C . No. 5:07-cv-01389-JW N o r th e r n District of California, S an Jose T IM E SCHEDULE ORDER

T h e parties shall meet the following time schedule:

M o n ., September 15, 2008 T h e party(s) who filed the first appeal shall file and serv e the first brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 3 2 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1; W ed ., October 15, 2008 T h e party(s) who filed the second appeal shall file an d serve the second brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1; T h e third brief on cross-appeal shall be filed and serv ed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1;

F ri., November 14, 2008

T h e optional appellant/petitioner reply brief shall be filed and served within fo u rteen days of service of the appellee/respondent's brief, pursuant to FRAP 3 2 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1.

Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in a u to m a tic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1 A p p e lla n ts /P e titio n e rs without representation of counsel in a prisoner appeal may h av e their case submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument, pursuant to FRAP 34(a). Within 10 days of the filing of the appellant's opening brief, p arties may file a statement setting forth the reasons why, in the opinion of the p arties, oral argument should be heard.

F O R THE COURT: M o lly C. Dwyer C le rk of Court

G e ra ld Rosen D e p u t y Clerk